linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"Gu, Zheng" <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	tangchen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: fixup existing pool->node
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 18:19:53 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418379595-6281-4-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418379595-6281-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Yasuaki Ishimatsu hit a bug when the numa mapping between CPU and node
is changed.  And the previous path fixup wq_numa_possible_cpumask.
(See more information form the changelog of that patch)

After wq_numa_possible_cpumask was updated, the new pool->node will be
correct, but the existing pools (and workers) are still running, some of
them are running with the wrong pool->node, or even worse, with pool->node
which is quitted node, they create_worker() on wrong pool->node.
These create_worker() may create workers on wrong node or failed without
any progress (when with pool->node which is quitted node).

So we need to update the pool->node when the numa mapping is changed.

We simply re-calc the pool->node when the numa mapping changed. It reuses
the code from get_unbound_pool() for unbound pool.

Reported-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Gu, Zheng" <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: tangchen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 4c88b61..7fbabf6 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3439,6 +3439,26 @@ static void put_unbound_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	call_rcu_sched(&pool->rcu, rcu_free_pool);
 }
 
+static int calc_pool_node(struct worker_pool *pool)
+{
+	int node;
+
+	if (pool->cpu >= 0)
+		return cpu_to_node(pool->cpu);
+
+	/* if cpumask is contained inside a NUMA node, we belong to that node */
+	if (wq_numa_enabled) {
+		for_each_node(node) {
+			if (cpumask_subset(pool->attrs->cpumask,
+					   wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node])) {
+				return node;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+}
+
 /**
  * get_unbound_pool - get a worker_pool with the specified attributes
  * @attrs: the attributes of the worker_pool to get
@@ -3457,7 +3477,6 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
 {
 	u32 hash = wqattrs_hash(attrs);
 	struct worker_pool *pool;
-	int node;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
@@ -3482,17 +3501,7 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
 	 * 'struct workqueue_attrs' comments for detail.
 	 */
 	pool->attrs->no_numa = false;
-
-	/* if cpumask is contained inside a NUMA node, we belong to that node */
-	if (wq_numa_enabled) {
-		for_each_node(node) {
-			if (cpumask_subset(pool->attrs->cpumask,
-					   wq_numa_possible_cpumask[node])) {
-				pool->node = node;
-				break;
-			}
-		}
-	}
+	pool->node = calc_pool_node(pool);
 
 	if (worker_pool_assign_id(pool) < 0)
 		goto fail;
@@ -3952,6 +3961,8 @@ out_unlock:
 static void wq_update_numa_mapping(int cpu)
 {
 	int node, orig_node = NUMA_NO_NODE, new_node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
+	struct worker_pool *pool;
+	int pi;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
 
@@ -3985,6 +3996,17 @@ static void wq_update_numa_mapping(int cpu)
 		else if (orig_node != NUMA_NO_NODE && node == orig_node)
 			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, wq_numa_possible_cpumask[orig_node]);
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Fixup pool->node, it needs to test for all pools, pool->node might be
+	 * changed from orig_node to new_node or from new_node to NUMA_NO_NODE
+	 * or NUMA_NO_NODE to orig_node or some other possibilities.
+	 */
+	for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
+		node = calc_pool_node(pool);
+		if (pool->node != node)
+			pool->node = node;
+	}
 }
 
 static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
@@ -4614,10 +4636,13 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
 		for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
 			mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
 
-			if (pool->cpu == cpu)
+			if (pool->cpu == cpu) {
+				if (unlikely(pool->node != cpu_to_node(cpu)))
+					pool->node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
 				rebind_workers(pool);
-			else if (pool->cpu < 0)
+			} else if (pool->cpu < 0) {
 				restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
+			}
 
 			mutex_unlock(&pool->attach_mutex);
 		}
-- 
1.7.4.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-12 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-12 10:19 [PATCH 0/5] workqueue: fix bug when numa mapping is changed Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] workqueue: fix memory leak in wq_numa_init() Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:12   ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15  5:25     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] workqueue: update wq_numa_possible_cpumask Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:18   ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15  2:02     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-25 20:16       ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-18  2:22   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 10:19 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2014-12-12 17:25   ` [PATCH 3/5] workqueue: fixup existing pool->node Tejun Heo
2014-12-15  1:23     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-25 20:14       ` Tejun Heo
2015-01-13  7:08         ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-01-13 15:24           ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] workqueue: update NUMA affinity for the node lost CPU Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 17:27   ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-15  1:28     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-25 20:17       ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-12 10:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] workqueue: retry on NUMA_NO_NODE when create_worker() fails Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-12 16:05   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-12-12 17:29     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2014-12-12 17:29   ` Tejun Heo
2014-12-12 17:13 ` [PATCH 0/5] workqueue: fix bug when numa mapping is changed Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-12-15  1:34   ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-18  1:50     ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2014-12-13 16:27 ` [PATCH 0/4] workqueue: fix bug when numa mapping is changed v2 Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:30   ` [PATCH 1/4] workqueue: add a hook for node hotplug Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:33   ` [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: add warning if pool->node is offline Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:35   ` [PATCH 3/4] workqueue: remove per-node unbound pool when node goes offline Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15  2:06     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15  2:06       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-13 16:38   ` [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: handle change in cpu-node relationship Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15  2:12     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15  2:20       ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15  2:48         ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15  2:55           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15  3:30             ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15  3:34             ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15  4:04               ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15  5:19                 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15  5:33                   ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:11   ` [PATCH 0/4] workqueue: fix memory allocation after numa mapping is changed v3 Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:14     ` [PATCH 1/4] workqueue:Fix unbound workqueue's node affinity detection Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16  5:30       ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16  7:32         ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16  7:54           ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-15 11:16     ` [PATCH 2/4] workqueue: update per-cpu workqueue's node affinity at,online-offline Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16  5:32       ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16  7:25         ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:18     ` [PATCH 3/4] workqueue: Update workqueue's possible cpumask when a new node, coming up Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16  7:49       ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-12-16  8:10         ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-16  8:18           ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
2014-12-15 11:22     ` [PATCH 4/4] workqueue: Handle cpu-node affinity change at CPU_ONLINE Kamezawa Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1418379595-6281-4-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).