From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751244AbdHCFfR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 3 Aug 2017 01:35:17 -0400
Received: from lelnx193.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.77]:54348 "EHLO
        lelnx193.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751207AbdHCFfP (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 3 Aug 2017 01:35:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: ti,edma: Add 66AK2G specific information
To: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
CC: Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Device Tree Mailing List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>
References: <20170801044119.16201-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com>
 <20170801044119.16201-2-lokeshvutla@ti.com>
 <31fe2206-675b-5425-412f-0033017f6511@ti.com>
 <f1d0ec82-6b93-9eff-9a7f-08994ffebcb4@ti.com>
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Message-ID: <1422a647-2dec-e2ff-f701-c6f0009cef26@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2017 11:04:45 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f1d0ec82-6b93-9eff-9a7f-08994ffebcb4@ti.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday 02 August 2017 10:33 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> On 8/1/2017 6:20 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> On 2017-08-01 07:41, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

>>> -Example:
>>> +Examples:
>>
>> Do we really need to expand the examples to have identical set, but with
>> power-domains?
> 
> IIRC, there was a feedback to add an example(not able to fine that
> specific email). If you strongly disagree with this, I can drop it and
> resend it.

This is only an example, not a comprehensive set of possibilities. I
think it should be kept to one.

Thanks,
Sekhar