linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, waiman.long@hp.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, migration/0/9
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:15:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1423710911.2046.50.camel@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150212003430.GA28656@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2015-02-11 at 16:34 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Did an earlier-than-usual port of v3.21 patches to post-v3.19, and
> hit the following on x86_64.  This happened after about 15 minutes of
> rcutorture.  In contrast, I have been doing successful 15-hour runs
> on v3.19.  I will check reproducibility and try to narrow it down.
> Might this be a duplicate of the bug that Raghavendra posted a fix for?
> 
> Anyway, this was on 3e8c04eb1174 (Merge branch 'for-3.20' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/libata).
> 
> [  837.287011] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, migration/0/9
> [  837.287013]  lock: 0xffff88001ea0fe80, .magic: ffffffff, .owner:  gî<81>ÿÿÿÿ/0, .owner_cpu: -42
> [  837.287013] CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: migration/0 Not tainted 3.19.0+ #1
> [  837.287013] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
> [  837.287013]  ffff88001ea0fe80 ffff88001ea0bc78 ffffffff818f6f4b ffffffff810a5a51
> [  837.287013]  ffffffff81e500e0 ffff88001ea0bc98 ffffffff818f3755 ffff88001ea0fe80
> [  837.287013]  ffffffff81ca4396 ffff88001ea0bcb8 ffffffff818f377b ffff88001ea0fe80
> [  837.287013] Call Trace:
> [  837.287013]  [<ffffffff818f6f4b>] dump_stack+0x45/0x57
> [  837.287013]  [<ffffffff810a5a51>] ? console_unlock+0x1f1/0x4c0
> [  837.287013]  [<ffffffff818f3755>] spin_dump+0x8b/0x90
> [  837.287013]  [<ffffffff818f377b>] spin_bug+0x21/0x26
> [  837.287013]  [<ffffffff8109923c>] do_raw_spin_unlock+0x5c/0xa0
> [  837.287013]  [<ffffffff81902587>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x27/0x50
> [  837.287013]  [<ffffffff8108f0a1>] complete+0x41/0x50

We did have some recent changes in completions:

7c34e318 (sched/completion: Add lock-free checking of the blocking case)
de30ec47 (sched/completion: Remove unnecessary ->wait.lock serialization when reading completion state)

The second one being more related (although both appear to make sense).
Perhaps some subtle implication in the completion_done side that
disappeared with the spinlock?

Thanks,
Davidlohr


  reply	other threads:[~2015-02-12  3:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-12  0:34 BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#0, migration/0/9 Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-12  3:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2015-02-12  3:43   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-12 17:28   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 17:41     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 17:58       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-12 19:10       ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-02-12 19:37         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 21:27           ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-13 18:17             ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-02-13 18:53               ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-14  8:35                 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-02-14 14:00                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 19:59         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-12 19:32       ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-02-12 19:39         ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-12 19:59 ` [PATCH] sched/completion: completion_done() should serialize with complete() Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-13 21:09   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-02-13 21:56   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-13 22:02     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-02-16  8:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-16 16:51     ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-02-18 17:06   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/completion: Serialize completion_done() " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1423710911.2046.50.camel@stgolabs.net \
    --to=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).