From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965374AbbCPRMN (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:12:13 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0184.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.184]:45329 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932193AbbCPRMJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2015 13:12:09 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2194:2198:2199:2200:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3867:3868:3871:3872:3873:3874:4250:4321:5007:6261:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12050:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: name29_85e9018508562 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1771 Message-ID: <1426525919.23897.11.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] checkpatch clean-up of rtl8723au's rtw_security.c From: Joe Perches To: Greg KH Cc: Jes Sorensen , "M. Vefa Bicakci" , Matthias Beyer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:11:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150316170714.GB20171@kroah.com> References: <1426378241-32469-1-git-send-email-m.v.b@runbox.com> <20150315093142.GY24643@lucy.3gs> <10669062.ZZNVxH5Tl9@lenny> <1426524927.23897.9.camel@perches.com> <20150316170714.GB20171@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10-0ubuntu1~14.10.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 18:07 +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:55:27AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 12:01 -0400, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > For staging patches, you should always post patches against the > > > staging-next tree. Please rebase them and repost them. > > Greg is now preferring patches against his > > staging-testing branch > staging-testing only lasts a day or so before it turns into > staging-next, so you are usually safe with using staging-next. Yeah but that usually is nothing but painful for those that are unfortunate enough to hit it.