linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke <tmac@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rtmutex Real-Time Linux: Fixing kernel BUG at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:997!
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 07:09:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428383383.3152.5.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150406215959.4e8ad37b@grimm.local.home>

On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 21:59 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> We really should have a rt_spin_trylock_in_irq() and not have the
> below if conditional.
> 
> The paths that will be executed in hard irq context are static. They
> should be labeled as such.

I did it as an explicitly labeled special purpose (naughty) pair.

---
 include/linux/spinlock_rt.h |    2 ++
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c    |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/include/linux/spinlock_rt.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock_rt.h
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ extern void __lockfunc rt_spin_unlock_wa
 extern int __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock_irqsave(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags);
 extern int __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock_bh(spinlock_t *lock);
 extern int __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock);
+extern int __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock_in_irq(spinlock_t *lock);
+extern void __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock_in_irq_unlock(spinlock_t *lock);
 extern int atomic_dec_and_spin_lock(atomic_t *atomic, spinlock_t *lock);
 
 /*
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_real_waiter(struct r
  * supports cmpxchg and if there's no debugging state to be set up
  */
 #if defined(__HAVE_ARCH_CMPXCHG) && !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES)
-# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n)       (cmpxchg(&l->owner, c, n) == c)
+# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n)       (cmpxchg(&(l)->owner, (c), (n)) == (c))
 static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
        unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner;
@@ -1208,6 +1208,35 @@ int __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock_irqsave(s
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_spin_trylock_irqsave);
 
+/*
+ * Special purpose for locks taken in interrupt context: Take and hold
+ * ->wait_lock lest PI catching us with our fingers in the cookie jar.
+ * Do NOT abuse.
+ */
+int __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock_in_irq(spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+       struct task_struct *owner;
+       if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->lock.wait_lock))
+               return 0;
+       owner = idle_task(raw_smp_processor_id());
+       if (!(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(&lock->lock, NULL, owner))) {
+               raw_spin_unlock(&lock->lock.wait_lock);
+               return 0;
+       }
+       spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+       return 1;
+}
+
+/* ONLY for use with rt_spin_trylock_in_irq(), do NOT abuse. */
+void __lockfunc rt_spin_trylock_in_irq_unlock(spinlock_t *lock)
+{
+       struct task_struct *owner = idle_task(raw_smp_processor_id());
+       /* NOTE: we always pass in '1' for nested, for simplicity */
+       spin_release(&lock->dep_map, 1, _RET_IP_);
+       BUG_ON(!(rt_mutex_cmpxchg(&lock->lock, owner, NULL)));
+       raw_spin_unlock(&lock->lock.wait_lock);
+}
+
 int atomic_dec_and_spin_lock(atomic_t *atomic, spinlock_t *lock)
 {
        /* Subtract 1 from counter unless that drops it to 0 (ie. it was 1) */

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-07  5:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-20  1:31 [PATCH 3.14.25-rt22 0/2] rtmutex Real-Time Linux: fix kernel BUG at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:997! and some optimization Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2015-02-20  1:31 ` [PATCH 3.14.25-rt22 1/2] rtmutex Real-Time Linux: Fixing kernel BUG at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:997! Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2015-02-20  4:53   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-20 18:54     ` Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2015-02-21  1:49       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-23 18:37   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-24  0:16     ` Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2015-02-24  0:57       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-02-26 13:56         ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-26 14:06           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-06 12:19             ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-03-09 16:36               ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-09 16:49                 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-02-20  1:31 ` [PATCH 3.14.25-rt22 2/2] kernel/locking/rtmutex.c: some code optimization Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2015-04-07  1:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] rtmutex Real-Time Linux: fix BUG at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:997! Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2015-04-07  1:26   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rtmutex Real-Time Linux: Fixing kernel " Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2015-04-07  1:59     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-07  5:09       ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2015-04-07 10:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-07 10:49           ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-07 10:56             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-07 11:01               ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-08  0:55       ` Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2015-04-08  8:50         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-09 22:56           ` Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke
2015-04-07 11:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-07 11:47       ` Mike Galbraith
2015-04-07 12:04         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-07 12:07           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-07 12:41           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-07 12:54             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-07 13:58               ` Steven Rostedt
2015-04-07 18:12           ` Jason Low
2015-04-07 19:17             ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-07 19:57               ` Jason Low
2015-04-07 21:38                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-04-07  1:26   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kernel/locking/rtmutex.c: some code optimization Thavatchai Makphaibulchoke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1428383383.3152.5.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tmac@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).