From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753177AbbDGKJV (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 7 Apr 2015 06:09:21 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:37390 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750983AbbDGKJU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 7 Apr 2015 06:09:20 -0400
Message-ID: <1428401356.3152.38.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why not build kernel with -O3
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Pengfei Yuan <0xcoolypf@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 12:09:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CACmZjJLLiML0wgojfxDujqusiYGvp=u1fPs7wMmXDaDcm55nOQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACmZjJK8oLLFWBzUZpRTVrTycu8JDfd+hg6bBuxi-a8U6Hk_1A@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1428388995.3152.10.camel@gmail.com>
	 <CACmZjJLLiML0wgojfxDujqusiYGvp=u1fPs7wMmXDaDcm55nOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.0 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2015-04-07 at 15:56 +0800, Pengfei Yuan wrote:
> I am trying legacy GCC versions.
> But I am not able to try different architectures.

The point of my reply wasn't to get you to actually test the world ;-)

I was indirectly pointing out that "works for me" is not good enough 
justification.  Much checking for safety/benefit required.

        -Mike