linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>,
	Stefan Weinhuber <wein@de.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com>,
	Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] block: loop: fix another reread part failure
Date: Wed,  8 Apr 2015 02:23:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428474226-27386-4-git-send-email-jarod@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1428474226-27386-1-git-send-email-jarod@redhat.com>

loop_clr_fd() can be run piggyback with lo_release(), and
under this situation, reread partition may always fail because
of bd_mutex which has been held in release path.

This patch detects the situation by the reference count, and
call blkdev_reread_part_nolock() to avoid acquiring the lock again.

In the meantime, this patch switches to new kernel APIs
of blkdev_reread_part() and blkdev_reread_part_nolock().

[jarod: this is a merger of my original patch, Ming's patch, and some
reworking for my reworked first patch in the series.]

CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
CC: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
CC: Stefan Weinhuber <wein@de.ibm.com>
CC: Stefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com>
CC: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
CC: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
CC: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@gmail.com>
CC: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net
CC: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/block/loop.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 81a6bc1..ab5c678 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -528,6 +528,26 @@ static int loop_flush(struct loop_device *lo)
 	return loop_switch(lo, NULL);
 }
 
+static void loop_reread_partitions(struct loop_device *lo,
+				   struct block_device *bdev)
+{
+	int rc;
+	bool in_release;
+
+	mutex_lock(&lo->lo_open_mutex);
+	in_release = lo->lo_refcnt == 0;
+	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_open_mutex);
+
+	/* bd_mutex has been held already in release path */
+	if (in_release)
+		rc = __blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
+	else
+		rc = blkdev_reread_part(bdev);
+	if (rc)
+		pr_warn("%s: partition scan of loop%d (%s) failed (rc=%d)\n",
+			__func__, lo->lo_number, lo->lo_file_name, rc);
+}
+
 /*
  * loop_change_fd switched the backing store of a loopback device to
  * a new file. This is useful for operating system installers to free up
@@ -576,7 +596,7 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct block_device *bdev,
 
 	fput(old_file);
 	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
-		ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0);
+		loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
 	return 0;
 
  out_putf:
@@ -807,7 +827,7 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t mode,
 	if (part_shift)
 		lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
 	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
-		ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0);
+		loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
 
 	/* Grab the block_device to prevent its destruction after we
 	 * put /dev/loopXX inode. Later in loop_clr_fd() we bdput(bdev).
@@ -933,7 +953,7 @@ static int loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo)
 	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_open_mutex);
 
 	if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev)
-		ioctl_by_bdev(bdev, BLKRRPART, 0);
+		loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
 	lo->lo_flags = 0;
 	if (!part_shift)
 		lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
@@ -1008,7 +1028,7 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
 	     !(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)) {
 		lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
 		lo->lo_disk->flags &= ~GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
-		ioctl_by_bdev(lo->lo_device, BLKRRPART, 0);
+		loop_reread_partitions(lo, lo->lo_device);
 	}
 
 	lo->lo_encrypt_key_size = info->lo_encrypt_key_size;
-- 
1.8.3.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-08  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-05  7:24 [PATCH 0/6] block: reread partitions changes and fix for loop Ming Lei
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [PATCH 1/6] block: export blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-05 16:12   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-05 16:40     ` Ming Lei
2015-04-06 13:42       ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-06 13:48         ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-07  2:43         ` Ming Lei
2015-04-06 14:50       ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-07  2:11         ` Ming Lei
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [PATCH 2/6] block: loop: don't hold lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open Ming Lei
2015-04-05 16:28   ` Ming Lei
2015-04-06 14:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [PATCH 3/6] block: loop: fix another reread part failure Ming Lei
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [PATCH 4/6] block: nbd: convert to blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [PATCH 5/6] block: dasd_genhd: convert to blkdev_reread_part Ming Lei
2015-04-06 13:46   ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-06 13:51     ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-07  1:59       ` Ming Lei
2015-04-07  0:47     ` Ming Lei
2015-04-05  7:24 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] block: replace trylock with mutex_lock in __blkdev_reread_part() Ming Lei
2015-04-08  6:23 ` [PATCH 0/7] block: reread partitions improvements Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 1/7] block: export blkdev_reread_part() and __blkdev_reread_part() Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08 14:50     ` Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-08 15:27         ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08 15:28         ` Ming Lei
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 2/7] block: loop: don't hold lo_ctl_mutex in lo_open Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:50     ` Ming Lei
2015-04-08 13:40       ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08 14:00         ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08 14:20           ` Ming Lei
2015-04-08 15:28             ` Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` Jarod Wilson [this message]
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 4/7] block: nbd: convert to blkdev_reread_part() Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 5/7] block: dasd_genhd: convert to blkdev_reread_part Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 6/7] block: replace trylock with mutex_lock in blkdev_reread_part() Jarod Wilson
2015-04-08  6:23   ` [PATCH 7/7] s390/block/dasd: remove obsolete while -EBUSY loop Jarod Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1428474226-27386-4-git-send-email-jarod@redhat.com \
    --to=jarod@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bitbucket@online.de \
    --cc=dh.herrmann@gmail.com \
    --cc=fabf@skynet.be \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=mpa@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wein@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).