linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>
To: "linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com" <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>,
	"andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" 
	<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: enable for ARC
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 07:48:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1428565685.2536.4.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYTpLKXRdeCVMkCnXmBg84HEsc0qzfPai5dFOnQ1G+ZVg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 17:03 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin
> <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> >
> > Synopsys SDP platform uses DW GPIO controller in design with
> > ARC cores. So adding ARC to architectures that may select this
> > GPIO controller.
> >
> > Even though support for Synopsys SDP is yet to be submitted we'll need
> > this tiny option enabled at least for properly working interrupts (DW
> > GPIO controller is used as interrupt controller).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
> > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> 
> Patch applied.
> 
> But ...
> 
> > -       depends on ((ARM || ARM64) && OF_GPIO) || X86_INTEL_QUARK
> > +       depends on ((ARC || ARM || ARM64) && OF_GPIO) || X86_INTEL_QUARK
> 
> This is getting a bit silly. What stops us from actually just enabling
> it for any architecture?

Agree. That looks like nonsense now.
Origin of arch-limitation is
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/gpio/Kconfig?id=1972c97db5b0c125918f662cd084c7d5370674c0

--->8---
gpio: dwapb: fix compile errors
Whereas the DWAPB driver does not really depend on the ARM
architecture, it uses [readl|writel]_relaxed() not found on
arch such as Blackfin, so restrict this to ARM until there is
another architecture that can make use of it.

It is also using the of_node of the gpiochip, so fix this
too by requiring OF_GPIO.

All error/warnings:

make.cross ARCH=blackfin
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_irq_handler':
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:91:2: error: implicit declaration of function
'readl_relaxed' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_configure_irqs':
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:212:32: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no
member named 'of_node'
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:221:16: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no
member named 'of_node'
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c: In function 'dwapb_gpio_add_port':
drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c:331:14: error: 'struct gpio_chip' has no
member named 'of_node'
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
--->8---

Probably better fix is to make dwgpio depend on !BLACKFIN because we
know it won't be built for it. If there're other arches that don't
define [readl|writel]_relaxed() we may add them as well.

-Alexey

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-09  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-31  8:30 [PATCH] gpio: dwapb: enable for ARC Alexey Brodkin
2015-04-07 13:55 ` Alexey Brodkin
2015-04-08 10:18   ` Vineet Gupta
2015-04-08 15:03 ` Linus Walleij
2015-04-09  7:48   ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2015-04-09  8:29     ` Linus Walleij
2015-04-09 10:31       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-04-15  8:13         ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1428565685.2536.4.camel@synopsys.com \
    --to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).