From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753416AbbEAJ2I (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2015 05:28:08 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:51050 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751145AbbEAJ2D (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 May 2015 05:28:03 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,350,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="703720132" Message-ID: <1430472480.2878.397.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: i2o: Remove unwanted semicolon From: Alan Cox To: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" Cc: One Thousand Gnomes , "Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.)" , "devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" , "somyaanand214@gmail.com" , "iskaranth@gmail.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Fri, 01 May 2015 10:28:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20150501074103.GA19840@kroah.com> References: <20150423133751.GA10268@IND12F0122> <1429801768.2878.361.camel@linux.intel.com> <20150430141406.GA8230@kroah.com> <20150430232548.0ee0a0a5@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20150501074103.GA19840@kroah.com> Organization: Intel Corporation Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 (3.12.11-1.fc21) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 09:41 +0200, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:25:48PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 16:14:06 +0200 > > "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 04:09:28PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 13:43 +0000, Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath (H.) > > > > wrote: > > > > > This patch removes unwanted semicolon around close braces of code blocks > > > > > > > > > > > > The i2o driver moved into staging ready to be deleted unless someone > > > > steps up with hardware willing to maintain it (which is rather > > > > unlikely). > > > > > > I think it's now time to delete these, want me to do that for 4.2? I > > > can queue that up in my tree now, so that we don't see any more cleanup > > > patches being made for them? > > > > Yeah I think it can go.... > > I was about to delete it, but what about drivers/scsi/dpt/dpti_i2o.* ? > Should that be removed as well? Possibly but that ought to go via staging and really is one for the SCSI folks to call. The dpt_i2o was a bit more common than i2o proper. Alan