linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCHv4 09/10] zram: close race by open overriding
Date: Mon,  4 May 2015 21:39:01 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1430743142-15854-10-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430743142-15854-1-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>

From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>

[1] introduced bdev->bd_mutex to protect a race between mount
and reset. At that time, we don't have dynamic zram-add/remove
feature so it was okay.

However, as we introduce dynamic device feature, bd_mutex became
trouble.

	CPU 0

echo 1 > /sys/block/zram<id>/reset
  -> kernfs->s_active(A)
    -> zram:reset_store->bd_mutex(B)

	CPU 1

echo <id> > /sys/class/zram/zram-remove
  ->zram:zram_remove: bd_mutex(B)
  -> sysfs_remove_group
    -> kernfs->s_active(A)

IOW, AB -> BA deadlock

The reason we are holding bd_mutex for zram_remove is to prevent
any incoming open /dev/zram[0-9]. Otherwise, we could remove zram
others already have opened. But it causes above deadlock problem.

To fix the problem, this patch overrides block_device.open and
it returns -EBUSY if zram asserts he claims zram to reset so any
incoming open will be failed so we don't need to hold bd_mutex
for zram_remove ayn more.

This patch is to prepare for zram-add/remove feature.

[1] ba6b17: zram: fix umount-reset_store-mount race condition

[Sergey: simplify reset_store()]
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h |  4 ++++
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 3df4394..b3541df 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -1068,45 +1068,60 @@ static ssize_t reset_store(struct device *dev,
 	struct zram *zram;
 	struct block_device *bdev;
 
+	ret = kstrtou16(buf, 10, &do_reset);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!do_reset)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	zram = dev_to_zram(dev);
 	bdev = bdget_disk(zram->disk, 0);
-
 	if (!bdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
-	/* Do not reset an active device! */
-	if (bdev->bd_openers) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-		goto out;
+	/* Do not reset an active device or claimed device */
+	if (bdev->bd_openers || zram->claim) {
+		mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+		bdput(bdev);
+		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 
-	ret = kstrtou16(buf, 10, &do_reset);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out;
-
-	if (!do_reset) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	/* From now on, anyone can't open /dev/zram[0-9] */
+	zram->claim = true;
+	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
 
-	/* Make sure all pending I/O is finished */
+	/* Make sure all the pending I/O are finished */
 	fsync_bdev(bdev);
 	zram_reset_device(zram);
-
-	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
 	revalidate_disk(zram->disk);
 	bdput(bdev);
 
+	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+	zram->claim = false;
+	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
+
 	return len;
+}
+
+static int zram_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct zram *zram;
+
+	WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&bdev->bd_mutex));
+
+	zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
+	/* zram was claimed to reset so open request fails */
+	if (zram->claim)
+		ret = -EBUSY;
 
-out:
-	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
-	bdput(bdev);
 	return ret;
 }
 
 static const struct block_device_operations zram_devops = {
+	.open = zram_open,
 	.swap_slot_free_notify = zram_slot_free_notify,
 	.rw_page = zram_rw_page,
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE
diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
index 042994e..6dbe2df 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
@@ -115,5 +115,9 @@ struct zram {
 	 */
 	u64 disksize;	/* bytes */
 	char compressor[10];
+	/*
+	 * zram is claimed so open request will be failed
+	 */
+	bool claim; /* Protected by bdev->bd_mutex */
 };
 #endif
-- 
2.4.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-04 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 12:38 [PATCHv4 00/10] add on-demand device creation Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCHv4 01/10] zram: add `compact` sysfs entry to documentation Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCHv4 02/10] zram: cosmetic ZRAM_ATTR_RO code formatting tweak Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCHv4 03/10] zram: use idr instead of `zram_devices' array Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCHv4 04/10] zram: reorganize code layout Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCHv4 05/10] zram: remove max_num_devices limitation Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCHv4 06/10] zram: report every added and removed device Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-04 12:38 ` [PATCHv4 07/10] zram: trivial: correct flag operations comment Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-04 12:39 ` [PATCHv4 08/10] zram: return zram device_id from zram_add() Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-04 12:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2015-05-04 12:39 ` [PATCHv4 10/10] zram: add dynamic device add/remove functionality Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-06  5:01 ` [PATCHv4 00/10] add on-demand device creation Minchan Kim
2015-05-06  5:25   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-06  6:52     ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-06  7:07     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-06  7:28       ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-06  8:10         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-06  8:20           ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-07  0:33             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-07  7:41               ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-07 12:09                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-07 13:04                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-07 15:11                     ` Minchan Kim
2015-05-08  0:15                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-10  8:47                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-05-06  5:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1430743142-15854-10-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).