From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net,
eranian@google.com, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/6] exterr: Introduce extended syscall error reporting
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:02:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1442336539.1914.34.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150915103556.36b06f09@lwn.net>
> I think that anything other than the errno "grab it now or lose it"
> behavior will prove confusing. I don't think there is any other way to
> know that a given error report corresponds to a specific system call.
> Library calls can mess it up. Kernel changes adding extended reporting to
> new system calls can mess it up. Applications cannot possibly be expected
> to know which system calls might change the error-reporting status, they
> *have* to assume all of them will.
>
Yeah I was about to say something similar - an application that expects
a certain syscall to have extended errors will get confused if running
on an older kernel where that syscall in fact does *not* have extended
errors (and thus also doesn't clear extended errors) and therefore the
extended error from a previous syscall could still be lingering on (for
example because the application didn't care to fetch it for that previo
us syscall.)
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-15 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-11 15:59 [PATCH RFC v3 0/6] Introduce extended syscall error reporting Alexander Shishkin
2015-09-11 16:00 ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/6] exterr: " Alexander Shishkin
2015-09-14 20:19 ` Jonathan Corbet
2015-09-15 14:15 ` Alexander Shishkin
2015-09-15 14:31 ` Johannes Berg
2015-09-15 15:24 ` Alexander Shishkin
2015-09-15 16:35 ` Jonathan Corbet
2015-09-15 17:02 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2015-09-14 21:59 ` Jonathan Corbet
2016-01-11 10:34 ` Alexander Shishkin
2015-09-11 16:00 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/6] perf: Use " Alexander Shishkin
2015-09-11 16:00 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/6] perf/x86: Annotate a BTS error with extended " Alexander Shishkin
2015-09-11 16:00 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/6] perf tools: Add a simple JSON parser Alexander Shishkin
2015-09-11 16:00 ` [PATCH RFC v3 5/6] perf tools: Add userspace counterpart for extended error reporting Alexander Shishkin
2015-09-11 16:00 ` [PATCH RFC v3 6/6] perf tools: Use extended syscall " Alexander Shishkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1442336539.1914.34.camel@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=vince@deater.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).