From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932070AbbKGSCN (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Nov 2015 13:02:13 -0500 Received: from smtprelay0097.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.97]:48834 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753311AbbKGSCL (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Nov 2015 13:02:11 -0500 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1566:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3866:3867:3871:4321:5007:6261:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:14659:21080:30054:30064:30091,0,RBL:error,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:error,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2000,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: burst54_2f4e184edf55c X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1344 Message-ID: <1446919324.2701.1.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: iio: Fix some character line limit coding style issues From: Joe Perches To: Dan Carpenter , Evan Hosseini Cc: lars@metafoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@analog.com, jic23@kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:02:04 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20151107163005.GI18797@mwanda> References: <20151107150610.GA3250@archBox.attlocal.net> <20151107163005.GI18797@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2015-11-07 at 19:30 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The original is easier to read, sorry. Checkpatch is a tool not the > king of the world to obeyed at all times. Completely agree. Perhaps there could be some comment indicators added to tell checkpatch to ignore certain warnings like 80 columns.