From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932613AbbLVNh6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:37:58 -0500 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:36714 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754228AbbLVNhB (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:37:01 -0500 X-Listener-Flag: 11101 Message-ID: <1450791416.20501.7.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: mediatek: convert to arch_initcall From: Yingjoe Chen To: Linus Walleij CC: Daniel Kurtz , Matthias Brugger , Fabio Estevam , Hongzhou Yang , "Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" , Fabian Frederick , Maoguang Meng , Axel Lin , Patrice Chotard , "open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM" , open list , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:36:56 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <1450412497-25872-1-git-send-email-djkurtz@chromium.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 11:23 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:21 AM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: > > > Move pinctrl initialization earlier in boot so that real devices can find > > their pctldev without probe deferring. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz > > I interpret the discussion as I should wait for a new version of this? > > Or should it be applied? We'll have another patch to change init orders for pwrap, mt6397 mfd core and mt6397 regulator. Before that, the mt6397 pinctrl changes in this patch won't work as expect. Apply this now won't cause any problem either, unless someone think we should stink to current orders. So I think we could apply this now: Acked-by: Yingjoe Chen Joe.C