From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030274AbXCENjR (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:39:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030319AbXCENjR (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:39:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:43171 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030274AbXCENjQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:39:16 -0500 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20070305014951.GD3441@stusta.de> References: <20070305014951.GD3441@stusta.de> <20070304152506.GC3441@stusta.de> <20070304041111.1d2774e7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070302030026.5eef0c92.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070302030405.22f78999.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <45EAB46F.1030709@gmail.com> <14778.1173021069@redhat.com> <15200.1173022514@redhat.com> To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Andrew Morton , Maciej Rutecki , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells Subject: Re: [-mm patch] fix the ROMFS_* dependencies X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:36:55 +0000 Message-ID: <14518.1173101815@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > OK, what about the patch below? How many goats did you have to sacrifice to get that to work? I like it with just one very minor niggle: if CONFIG_BLOCK=y, CONFIG_MTD=y, CONFIG_ROMFS_FS=y CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y and CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK=y then the CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK configuration item disappears and reappears depending on the state of CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_MTD. But, as I said, it's a very minor niggle. Acked-By: David Howells