From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759582AbcAKMuq (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:50:46 -0500 Received: from relay.parallels.com ([195.214.232.42]:55076 "EHLO relay.parallels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757478AbcAKMup (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:50:45 -0500 From: Andrey Ryabinin To: Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Brian Gerst , Dave Hansen , Linus Torvalds , Oleg Nesterov , , , Andrey Ryabinin Subject: Re: [RFC 01/13] x86/paravirt: Turn KASAN off for parvirt.o Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 15:51:17 +0300 Message-ID: <1452516679-32040-1-git-send-email-aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.4.10 In-Reply-To: <20160110185916.GD22896@pd.tnic> References: <20160110185916.GD22896@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-ClientProxiedBy: US-EXCH.sw.swsoft.com (10.255.249.47) To MSK-EXCH1.sw.swsoft.com (10.67.48.55) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01/10/2016 09:59 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > + Andrey. > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:15:19PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Otherwise terrible things happen if some of the callbacks end up >> calling into KASAN in unexpected places. >> >> This has no obvious symptoms yet, but adding a memory reference to >> native_flush_tlb_global without this blows up on KASAN kernels. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski >> --- >> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile >> index b1b78ffe01d0..b7cd5bdf314b 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile >> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ endif >> KASAN_SANITIZE_head$(BITS).o := n >> KASAN_SANITIZE_dumpstack.o := n >> KASAN_SANITIZE_dumpstack_$(BITS).o := n >> +KASAN_SANITIZE_paravirt.o := n >> >> CFLAGS_irq.o := -I$(src)/../include/asm/trace > > Shouldn't we take this one irrespectively of what happens to the rest in > the patchset? > I don't think that this patch is the right way to solve the problem. The follow-up patch "x86/kasan: clear kasan_zero_page after TLB flush" should fix Andy's problem.