From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965227AbcBCRym (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:54:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:33723 "EHLO mail-pf0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933454AbcBCRyj (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:54:39 -0500 Message-ID: <1454522077.7627.264.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net:Add sysctl_max_skb_frags From: Eric Dumazet To: Alexander Duyck Cc: Hans Westgaard Ry , "David S. Miller" , Alexey Kuznetsov , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , Tom Herbert , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Eric Dumazet , Florian Westphal , Jiri Pirko , Alexander Duyck , Michal Hocko , Linus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=FCssing?= , Hannes Frederic Sowa , Herbert Xu , Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , Alexey Kodanev , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E5kon?= Bugge , open list , "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 09:54:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <568F87AC.60405@oracle.com> <1454488017-8822-1-git-send-email-hans.westgaard.ry@oracle.com> <1454515628.7627.245.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 09:43 -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: > Read the history. I still say it is best if we don't accept a partial > solution. If we are going to introduce the sysctl as a core item it > should function as a core item and not as something that belongs to > TCP only. But this patch is the base, adding both the core sysctl and its first usage. Do we really need to split it in 2 patches ? Really ? The goal is to use it in all skb providers were it might be a performance gain, once they are identified. Your points were already raised and will be addressed, by either me or you. And maybe others.