From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754688AbcBEOI5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:08:57 -0500 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:8080 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754277AbcBEOFH (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:05:07 -0500 From: Wang Nan To: Alexei Starovoitov , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Brendan Gregg CC: Adrian Hunter , Cody P Schafer , "David S. Miller" , He Kuang , =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=A9mie=20Galarneau?= , Jiri Olsa , Kirill Smelkov , Li Zefan , Masami Hiramatsu , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , , Wang Nan , Subject: [PATCH 44/54] perf record: Don't poll on overwrite channel Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:02:09 +0000 Message-ID: <1454680939-24963-45-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.4 In-Reply-To: <1454680939-24963-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> References: <1454680939-24963-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.107.193.248] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.56B4ABBC.028F,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 6581e7cff666932bd3e1f9fb08d3814f Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org There's no need to receive events from overwrite ring buffer. Instead, perf should make them run background until something happen. This patch makes events from overwrite ring buffer is ignored except POLLERR and POLLHUP. Signed-off-by: Wang Nan Signed-off-by: He Kuang Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Zefan Li Cc: pi3orama@163.com --- tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c index ee4b486..1ff57ef 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c @@ -461,9 +461,9 @@ int perf_evlist__alloc_pollfd(struct perf_evlist *evlist) return 0; } -static int __perf_evlist__add_pollfd(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int fd, int idx) +static int __perf_evlist__add_pollfd(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int fd, int idx, short revent) { - int pos = fdarray__add(&evlist->pollfd, fd, POLLIN | POLLERR | POLLHUP); + int pos = fdarray__add(&evlist->pollfd, fd, revent | POLLERR | POLLHUP); /* * Save the idx so that when we filter out fds POLLHUP'ed we can * close the associated evlist->mmap[] entry. @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static int __perf_evlist__add_pollfd(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int fd, int idx int perf_evlist__add_pollfd(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int fd) { - return __perf_evlist__add_pollfd(evlist, fd, -1); + return __perf_evlist__add_pollfd(evlist, fd, -1, POLLIN); } static void perf_evlist__munmap_filtered(struct fdarray *fda, int fd) @@ -1007,6 +1007,18 @@ perf_evlist__channel_complete(struct perf_evlist *evlist) return 0; } +static bool +perf_evlist__should_poll(struct perf_evlist *evlist, + struct perf_evsel *evsel, + int channel) +{ + if (evsel->system_wide) + return false; + if (perf_evlist__channel_check(evlist, channel, RDONLY)) + return false; + return true; +} + static int perf_evlist__mmap_per_evsel(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int _idx, struct mmap_params *mp, int cpu, int thread, int *outputs) @@ -1015,6 +1027,7 @@ static int perf_evlist__mmap_per_evsel(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int _idx, evlist__for_each(evlist, evsel) { int fd, channel, idx, err; + short revent = POLLIN; channel = perf_evlist__channel_find(evlist, evsel, false); if (channel < 0) { @@ -1044,6 +1057,8 @@ static int perf_evlist__mmap_per_evsel(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int _idx, perf_evlist__mmap_get(evlist, idx); } + if (!perf_evlist__should_poll(evlist, evsel, channel)) + revent = 0; /* * The system_wide flag causes a selected event to be opened * always without a pid. Consequently it will never get a @@ -1052,7 +1067,7 @@ static int perf_evlist__mmap_per_evsel(struct perf_evlist *evlist, int _idx, * Therefore don't add it for polling. */ if (!evsel->system_wide && - __perf_evlist__add_pollfd(evlist, fd, idx) < 0) { + __perf_evlist__add_pollfd(evlist, fd, idx, revent) < 0) { perf_evlist__mmap_put(evlist, idx); return -1; } -- 1.8.3.4