From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753838AbdEQIBj (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2017 04:01:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:32897 "EHLO mail-wm0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752300AbdEQIBf (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 May 2017 04:01:35 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] futex: remove duplicated code To: Will Deacon Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Vineet Gupta , Catalin Marinas , Richard Kuo , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Michal Simek , Ralf Baechle , Jonas Bonn , Stefan Kristiansson , Stafford Horne , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Helge Deller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Martin Schwidefsky , Yoshinori Sato , Rich Felker , "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Chris Zankel , Max Filippov , Arnd Bergmann , x86@kernel.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org References: <20170515130742.18357-1-jslaby@suse.cz> <20170515131644.GA3605@arm.com> From: Jiri Slaby Message-ID: <14580dfc-9721-38ab-a1e0-6b4aba13b406@suse.cz> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 10:01:29 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170515131644.GA3605@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/15/2017, 03:16 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > Whilst I think this is a good idea, the code in question actually results > in undefined behaviour per the C spec and is reported by UBSAN. Hi, yes, I know -- this patch was the 1st from the series of 3 which I sent a long time ago to fix that up too. But I remember your patch, so I sent only this one this time. > See my > patch fixing arm64 here (which I'd forgotten about): > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-arch/msg38564.html > > But, as stated in the thread above, I think we should go a step further > and remove FUTEX_OP_{OR,ANDN,XOR,OPARG_SHIFT} altogether. They don't > appear to be used by userspace, and this whole thing is a total mess. > > Any thoughts? Ok, I am all for that. I think the only question is who is going to do the work and submit it :)? Do I understand correctly to eliminate all these functions and the path into the kernel? But won't this break API -- are there really no users of this interface? thanks, -- js suse labs