linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] initial support for "suniv" Allwinner new ARM9 SoC
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 21:10:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14593819.uISRktVE4V@ice-x220i> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180122121435.bpayxk4uzfqbhqse@flea.lan>

在 2018年1月22日星期一 CST 下午8:14:35,Maxime Ripard 写道:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2018 at 07:17:26AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> > This is the RFC initial patchset for the "new" Allwinner SUNIV ARM9 SoC.
> > 
> > The same die is packaged differently, come with different co-packaged
> > DRAM or shipped with different SDK; and then made many model names: F23,
> > F25, F1C100A, F1C100S, F1C200S, F1C500, F1C600, R6, etc. These SoCs all
> > share a common feature set and are packaged similarly (eLQFP128 for SoCs
> > without co-packaged DRAM, QFN88 for with DRAM). As their's no
> > functionality hidden on the QFN88 models (except DRAM interface not
> > exported), it's not clever to differentiate them. So I will use suniv as
> > common name of all these SoCs.
> 
> Where is that suniv prefix coming from?

The BSP (Melis and Linux). (e.g. "libs/suniv" directory of the Melis SDK and 
"arch/arm/boot/dts/sunivw1p1.dtsi" in the Linux SDK)

> 
> And you need to have a SoC in all your compatibles. This isn't about
> being clever or not, this is just a matter of being able to accurately
> read in a crystal ball. Or maybe it's just the same, in which case,
> I'd really like to have a course :)

Okay. I will choose to use f1c100s in my next patchset, as it's where
it's developed. (Although I mainly refered F1C600 BSP and document)

> 
> You should really answer two questions here:
>   - Are you able to predict whether you'll find an SoC part of that
>     family in the future that derives a bit and will need a compatible
>     of its own?
>   - Are you able to predict which quirks we'll need along the way to
>     support all the SoCs you've listed there?
> 
> If you can't answer yes to both these questions, with a 100%
> certainty, then you'll need a SoC name in the compatible.
> 
> Which doesn't prevent you from sharing as much as possible the DT like
> we did between the A10s and the A13 for example.

So the suniv-f1c100s.dtsi will still be kept empty and all peripherals known 
should go through suniv.dtsi.

> 
> Maxime

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-24 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-19 23:17 Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-19 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] ARM: add CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI_V7 for differentiate ARMv5/v7 Allwinner SoCs Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-20  3:04   ` [linux-sunxi] " Julian Calaby
2018-01-19 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] ARM: sunxi: add Allwinner ARMv5 SoCs Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-20  3:06   ` [linux-sunxi] " Julian Calaby
2018-01-20  3:10     ` Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-20  3:22       ` Julian Calaby
2018-01-22 12:15         ` Maxime Ripard
2018-01-19 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] irqchip/sun4i: add support for suniv interrupt controller Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-19 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] clocksource: sun4i: add a compatible for suniv Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-19 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] clocksource/drivers/sun4i: register as sched_clock on suniv Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-19 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] pinctrl: sunxi: add support for suniv (newer F-series SoCs) Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-19 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] clk: sunxi-ng: add support for suniv SoC Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-19 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] ARM: dts: suniv: add initial DTSI file for suniv and F1C100s Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-21 11:03   ` Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
2018-01-19 23:17 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] ARM: suniv: f1c100s: add device tree for Lichee Pi Nano Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-22 12:14 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] initial support for "suniv" Allwinner new ARM9 SoC Maxime Ripard
2018-01-24 13:10   ` Icenowy Zheng [this message]
2018-01-25 15:35     ` Maxime Ripard
2018-01-25 15:38       ` Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-26 14:43         ` Maxime Ripard
2018-01-26 20:57       ` Icenowy Zheng
2018-01-29 19:48       ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14593819.uISRktVE4V@ice-x220i \
    --to=icenowy@aosc.io \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=wens@csie.org \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] initial support for "suniv" Allwinner new ARM9 SoC' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).