From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755821AbcDDOBm (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:01:42 -0400
Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:59172 "EHLO
	bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755795AbcDDOBk (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:01:40 -0400
Message-ID: <1459778496.2315.1.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mempool based chained scatterlist alloc/free api
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 07:01:36 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAF1ivSY-xbhv47a3UCDWmDb9PsUpTSOmXDyRmSAzMactbX_fxA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1458684196-15923-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org>
	 <20160323074012.GA17929@lst.de>
	 <CAF1ivSaxn7KbiLt0ByHoC-EyP-Q0ah33YGNv0rLoO-=sOvia5w@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1458834360.2544.12.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
	 <CAF1ivSbvrUUdMp60FAU6LURyCA9pkfaEzia+XB+1nfkDDW1WdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAF1ivSY-xbhv47a3UCDWmDb9PsUpTSOmXDyRmSAzMactbX_fxA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 2016-04-03 at 23:07 -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 8:46 AM, James Bottomley
> > <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 08:09 -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:03:11PM -0700, Ming Lin wrote:
> > > > > > From: Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The fist 4 patches make the SG related
> > > > > > definitions/structs/functions
> > > > > > in SCSI code generic and the last patch move it to
> > > > > > lib/sg_pool.c.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I still keep the macro "SG_MEMPOOL_NR" since it's used in 3
> > > > > > places.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I don't ѕee the point, but I'm not going to block the series
> > > > > over
> > > > > it either.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The new series looks really nice to me!
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > > > 
> > > > Hi James,
> > > > 
> > > > This series touches several sub-systems.
> > > > What's the best way to merge it?
> > > 
> > > It has a minor intrusion into
> > > 
> > >  drivers/ata/pata_icside.c           |   2 +-
> > >  drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c |   4 +-
> > >  drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c      |   2 +-
> > > 
> > > Apart from that, it's all SCSI, so the SCSI tree would seem to be
> > > the
> > > best one.
> > 
> > Are you OK to merge it?
> 
> Hi James,
> 
> Ping ...
> 
> Are you OK to apply this series?
> Or any changes needed?

It's got the needed reviews, but we need acks from tejun (ATA) and Sagi
(IB) and a repost fixing the test robot objection to patch 5.

James