From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751055AbcEIDwz (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2016 23:52:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37960 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750916AbcEIDwy (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 May 2016 23:52:54 -0400 Message-ID: <1462765971.3803.48.camel@suse.de> Subject: Re: sched: tweak select_idle_sibling to look for idle threads From: Mike Galbraith To: Yuyang Du Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Chris Mason , Ingo Molnar , Matt Fleming , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 05:52:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160508185747.GL16093@intel.com> References: <20160405180822.tjtyyc3qh4leflfj@floor.thefacebook.com> <20160409190554.honue3gtian2p6vr@floor.thefacebook.com> <20160430124731.GE2975@worktop.cust.blueprintrf.com> <1462086753.9717.29.camel@suse.de> <20160501085303.GF2975@worktop.cust.blueprintrf.com> <1462094425.9717.45.camel@suse.de> <20160507012417.GK16093@intel.com> <1462694935.4155.83.camel@suse.de> <20160508185747.GL16093@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 02:57 +0800, Yuyang Du wrote: > In addition, I would argue maybe beefing up idle balancing is a more > productive way to spread load, as work-stealing just does what needs > to be done. And seems it has been (sub-unconsciously) neglected in this > case, :) P.S. Nope, I'm dinging up multiple spots ;-)