From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751795AbcEIUWW (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 16:22:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:33965 "EHLO mail-pa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751458AbcEIUWR (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 May 2016 16:22:17 -0400 From: Kees Cook To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Kees Cook , Borislav Petkov , Baoquan He , Yinghai Lu , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , Vivek Goyal , Andy Lutomirski , lasse.collin@tukaani.org, Andrew Morton , Dave Young , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, LKML Subject: [PATCH v7 4/9] x86/KASLR: Return earliest overlap when avoiding regions Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 13:22:07 -0700 Message-Id: <1462825332-10505-5-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.6.3 In-Reply-To: <1462825332-10505-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> References: <1462825332-10505-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In preparation for being able to detect where to split up contiguous memory regions that overlap with memory regions to avoid, we need to pass back what the earliest overlapping region was. This modifies the overlap checker to return that information. Based on a separate mem_min_overlap() implementation by Baoquan He. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook --- arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c index 89f0148e3e84..1c02f07ce55a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c @@ -279,15 +279,24 @@ static void mem_avoid_init(unsigned long input, unsigned long input_size, #endif } -/* Does this memory vector overlap a known avoided area? */ -static bool mem_avoid_overlap(struct mem_vector *img) +/* + * Does this memory vector overlap a known avoided area? If so, record the + * overlap region with the lowest address. + */ +static bool mem_avoid_overlap(struct mem_vector *img, + struct mem_vector *overlap) { int i; struct setup_data *ptr; + unsigned long earliest = img->start + img->size; + bool is_overlapping = false; for (i = 0; i < MEM_AVOID_MAX; i++) { - if (mem_overlaps(img, &mem_avoid[i])) - return true; + if (mem_overlaps(img, &mem_avoid[i]) && + mem_avoid[i].start < earliest) { + *overlap = mem_avoid[i]; + is_overlapping = true; + } } /* Avoid all entries in the setup_data linked list. */ @@ -298,13 +307,15 @@ static bool mem_avoid_overlap(struct mem_vector *img) avoid.start = (unsigned long)ptr; avoid.size = sizeof(*ptr) + ptr->len; - if (mem_overlaps(img, &avoid)) - return true; + if (mem_overlaps(img, &avoid) && (avoid.start < earliest)) { + *overlap = avoid; + is_overlapping = true; + } ptr = (struct setup_data *)(unsigned long)ptr->next; } - return false; + return is_overlapping; } static unsigned long slots[KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE / CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN]; @@ -361,7 +372,7 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct e820entry *entry, unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size) { - struct mem_vector region, img; + struct mem_vector region, img, overlap; /* Skip non-RAM entries. */ if (entry->type != E820_RAM) @@ -400,7 +411,7 @@ static void process_e820_entry(struct e820entry *entry, for (img.start = region.start, img.size = image_size ; mem_contains(®ion, &img) ; img.start += CONFIG_PHYSICAL_ALIGN) { - if (mem_avoid_overlap(&img)) + if (mem_avoid_overlap(&img, &overlap)) continue; slots_append(img.start); } -- 2.6.3