From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753193AbcEMD71 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2016 23:59:27 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:19190 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751510AbcEMD7Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 May 2016 23:59:25 -0400 Message-ID: <1463111956.12239.15.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701 From: CK Hu To: CC: , Philipp Zabel , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , "Mark Rutland" , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "Russell King" , David Airlie , "Matthias Brugger" , Mao Huang , "Bibby Hsieh" , , , , , , "Sascha Hauer" Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 11:59:16 +0800 In-Reply-To: <1463053795-55455-3-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> References: <1463053795-55455-1-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> <1463053795-55455-3-git-send-email-yt.shen@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, YT: On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 19:49 +0800, yt.shen@mediatek.com wrote: > From: YT Shen > > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem. > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701, and we have shadow > register support here. > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen > --- > @@ -385,12 +422,16 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_begin(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > mtk_crtc->event = state->base.event; > state->base.event = NULL; > } > + > + if (priv->data->shadow_register) > + mtk_disp_mutex_acquire(mtk_crtc->mutex); > } > > @@ -409,6 +450,11 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_flush(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > } > if (pending_planes) > mtk_crtc->pending_planes = true; > + > + if (priv->data->shadow_register) { > + mtk_crtc_ddp_config(crtc); > + mtk_disp_mutex_release(mtk_crtc->mutex); > + } > } > I think it's better to call mtk_disp_mutex_acquire() and mtk_disp_mutex_release() as near as possible to prevent mutex locked for a long time. All HW register access of this atomic setting is in mtk_crtc_ddp_config(), so it's better to move mtk_disp_mutex_acquire() just before mtk_crtc_ddp_config(). Regards, CK