From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754970AbcESQCn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 19 May 2016 12:02:43 -0400
Received: from ms01.sssup.it ([193.205.80.99]:47827 "EHLO sssup.it"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754127AbcESQCl (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 19 May 2016 12:02:41 -0400
From: Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
To: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
Subject: SCHED_DEADLINE cpudeadline.{h,c} fixup
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 18:02:08 +0200
Message-Id: <1463673732-944-1-git-send-email-tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi all,

I took Luca's advice to isolate the deadline wrap-around bugfix with a
first minimally invasive patch (1-line). This leaves some weirdness in
how cpudl_change_key() is called.
Therefore, the second patch does a minimum of refactory to make things
more explicit and clear.
The 3rd patch contains now the actual performance enhancement (avoiding
unneeded swaps during heapify operations), which, as said in the previous
post, achieves up to 6% of speed-up for cpudl_set() calls.
Finally, the 4th patch is another clear-up patch touching cpudeadline.{h,c}
and deadline.c. Now you call cpudl_clear(cp, cpu) and cpudl_set(cp, cpu, dl)
instead of cpudl_set(cp, cpu, 0 /* dl */, 0  /* is_valid */) and
cpudl_set(cp, cpu, dl, 1 /* is_valid */).

Please, let me know how this looks like now.

Thanks,

  Tommaso