From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752180AbcEVJwr (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2016 05:52:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:35481 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751898AbcEVJwp (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 May 2016 05:52:45 -0400 Message-ID: <1463910760.3698.3.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [patch] sched/fair: Move se->vruntime normalization state into struct sched_entity From: Mike Galbraith To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavan Kondeti , Ben Segall , Matt Fleming , Morten Rasmussen , Paul Turner , Thomas Gleixner , byungchul.park@lge.com, Andrew Hunter Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 11:52:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160522093638.GL3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20160510174314.355953085@infradead.org> <20160510174613.902178264@infradead.org> <1463839488.24578.45.camel@suse.de> <1463857236.10353.5.camel@gmail.com> <1463900401.30072.6.camel@gmail.com> <20160522093638.GL3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 11:36 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:00:01AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 16:04 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > > > Wakees that were not migrated/normalized eat an unwanted min_vruntime, > > > > and likely take a size XXL latency hit. Big box running master bled > > > > profusely under heavy load until I turned TTWU_QUEUE off. > > > > May as well make it official and against master.today. Fly or die > > little patchlet. > > > > sched/fair: Move se->vruntime normalization state into struct sched_entity > > Yeah, I used to have a patch like this; but for debugging. I don't > particularly like carrying this information other than for verification > because it means we either do too much or too little normalization. > > I'll try and have a look on Monday, but I got some real-life things to > sort out first.. Ok (flush, say hi to the goldfish little patchlet). I don't care how it gets fixed, only that it does, and yours will likely be prettier :) -Mike