From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756994AbcEaJJc (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 05:09:32 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:32711 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756900AbcEaJJB (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 05:09:01 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,395,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="977754290" From: Yuyang Du To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com, bsegall@google.com, pjt@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, Yuyang Du Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched: Clean up SD_BALANCE_WAKE flags in sched domain build-up Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 09:11:37 +0800 Message-Id: <1464657098-24880-2-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1464657098-24880-1-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com> References: <1464657098-24880-1-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The SD_BALANCE_WAKE is irrelevant in the contexts of these two removals, and in addition SD_BALANCE_WAKE is not and should not be set in any sched_domain flags so far. Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du --- kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 7f2cae4..e00b8ea 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -6229,10 +6229,10 @@ static void set_domain_attribute(struct sched_domain *sd, request = attr->relax_domain_level; if (request < sd->level) { /* turn off idle balance on this domain */ - sd->flags &= ~(SD_BALANCE_WAKE|SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE); + sd->flags &= ~(SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE); } else { /* turn on idle balance on this domain */ - sd->flags |= (SD_BALANCE_WAKE|SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE); + sd->flags |= (SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE); } } -- 1.7.9.5