linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
To: a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com
Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	matthew.garrett@nebula.com,
	Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] rtc-cmos: Restore alarm after resume
Date: Wed,  1 Jun 2016 17:40:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464795615-7748-2-git-send-email-gabriele.mzt@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464795615-7748-1-git-send-email-gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>

Some platform firmware may interfere with the RTC alarm over suspend,
resulting in the kernel and hardware having different ideas about system
state but also potentially causing problems with firmware that assumes the
OS will clean this case up.  This patch restores the RTC alarm on resume
to ensure that kernel and hardware are in sync.

The case we've seen is Intel Rapid Start, which is a firmware-mediated
feature that automatically transitions systems from suspend-to-RAM to
suspend-to-disk without OS involvement.  It does this by setting the RTC
alarm and a flag that indicates that on wake it should perform the
transition rather than re-starting the OS.  However, if the OS has set a
wakeup alarm that would wake the machine earlier, it refuses to overwrite
it and allows the system to wake instead.

This fails in the following situation:

1) User configures Intel Rapid Start to transition after (say) 15
minutes
2) User suspends to RAM. Firmware sets the wakeup alarm for 15 minutes
in the future
3) User resumes after 5 minutes. Firmware does not reset the alarm, and
as such it is still set for 10 minutes in the future
4) User suspends after 5 minutes. Firmware notices that the alarm is set
for 5 minutes in the future, which is less than the 15 minute transition
threshold. It therefore assumes that the user wants the machine to wake
in 5 minutes
5) System resumes after 5 minutes

The worst case scenario here is that the user may have put the system in a
bag between (4) and (5), resulting in it running in a confined space and
potentially overheating.  This seems reasonably important.  The Rapid
Start support code got added in 3.11, but it can be configured in the
firmware regardless of kernel support.

Signed-off-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
---
This a rework of http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/423494/.

I think rtc-cmos is the only timer that needs to be protected from unwated
firmware changes, but I'm not sure of this. This is enough to fix the
problem on my laptop.

 drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
index fd121e3..83fd4df 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -918,6 +918,9 @@ static void cmos_check_alarm(struct device *dev)
 		cmos->suspend_ctrl &= ~RTC_AIE;
 		rtc_set_alarm(cmos->rtc, &alarm);
 	}
+
+	/* The BIOS might have changed the alarm, restore it */
+	cmos_set_alarm(dev, &alarm);
 }
 
 static int cmos_resume(struct device *dev)
-- 
2.8.1

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01 15:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-01 15:40 [PATCH 1/2] rtc-cmos: Clear expired alarm after resume Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-06-01 15:40 ` Gabriele Mazzotta [this message]
2016-06-01 16:11 ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-06-04 14:46 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-06-04 16:58   ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-06-04 17:48     ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-08-25 14:54       ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-08-30 23:28         ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-08-31 15:05           ` Gabriele Mazzotta
2016-08-31 16:08             ` Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1464795615-7748-2-git-send-email-gabriele.mzt@gmail.com \
    --to=gabriele.mzt@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).