From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751624AbcFEQOn (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:14:43 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:32318 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750884AbcFEQOm (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:14:42 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,422,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="714264780" Message-ID: <1465143355.1767.87.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/uuid.c: eliminate uuid_[bl]e_index arrays From: Andy Shevchenko To: Joe Perches , George Spelvin Cc: bjorn@mork.no, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matt@codeblueprint.co.uk, rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk, Robert Moore , Lv Zheng , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 19:15:55 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1465140873.11800.59.camel@perches.com> References: <20160604051453.3758.qmail@ns.sciencehorizons.net> <1465057748.11800.53.camel@perches.com> <1465136356.1767.55.camel@linux.intel.com> <1465140873.11800.59.camel@perches.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.2-2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 08:34 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 17:19 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 09:29 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > > (adding acpi folks) > > > Trivially, acpi defines this but doesn't seem to use it. > > > > > > include/acpi/acconfig.h:#define UUID_STRING_LENGTH          36  /* > > > Total length of a UUID string */ > > > > > > And Ingo commented last month: > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/29/69 > > > > > > Maybe this __uuid_to_bin function should be made public and > > > the acpi version in drivers/acpi/acpica/utuuid.c should be > > > removed. > > Looks like you missed my first version of (other) series. > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-api/msg17518.html > > More like if a patch isn't applied after several months, > it's likely not going to be applied unless it is resent. The discussion was about how to proceed with uuid_*_cmp() functions that have prototypes like uuid_le x1, x2. Any ideas come to mind? -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy