From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161038AbcFGNQt (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:16:49 -0400 Received: from mailgw02.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.184]:50695 "EHLO mailgw02.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752903AbcFGNQs (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:16:48 -0400 Message-ID: <1465305402.26524.6.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] checkpatch: add Kconfig 'default n' test From: Yingjoe Chen To: Andy Whitcroft CC: Joe Perches , Andrew Morton , , , Andi Kleen , Paul Bolle Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 21:16:42 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20160606191047.GK18360@brain> References: <1465017040-12777-1-git-send-email-yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> <1465231395.25087.13.camel@perches.com> <20160606191047.GK18360@brain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Thanks for the review. On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 20:10 +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:43:15AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 13:10 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote: > > > If a Kconfig config option doesn't specify 'default', the default > > > will be n. Adding 'default n' is unnecessary. > > > Add a test to warn about this. > > > > Is it obvious that a Kconfig has "default n" ? > > This seems to work, but is this useful? While sending patch for upstream, I saw maintainers request it to be removed. So I think it might worth adding check to it. Some examples from google: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-September/120733.html https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/16/153 https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/23/657 > > > > + if ($realfile =~ /Kconfig/ && > > > + $line =~ /^\+\s*default\s*n\s*(#.*|$)/i) { > > I wonder particually when the submitter has supplied a comment, presumably > to tell us why it defaults to 'n'. I feel more accepting of rejecting > uncommented ones than those with. How about change this to /^\+\s*default\s*n$/i ? Joe.C