linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset
@ 2016-06-12 14:05 Sudip Mukherjee
  2016-06-16 20:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2016-06-12 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Huewe, Marcel Selhorst, Jarkko Sakkinen, Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: linux-kernel, tpmdd-devel, Sudip Mukherjee

If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling put_device() to
free the resources allocated. Lets use the helper
devm_add_action_or_reset() and return directly in case of error, as we
know that the cleanup function has been already called by the helper if
there was any error.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
index 1965dc7..5a2f043 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
@@ -213,11 +213,11 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpmm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
 	if (IS_ERR(chip))
 		return chip;
 
-	rc = devm_add_action(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device, &chip->dev);
-	if (rc) {
-		put_device(&chip->dev);
+	rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(pdev,
+				      (void (*)(void *)) put_device,
+				      &chip->dev);
+	if (rc)
 		return ERR_PTR(rc);
-	}
 
 	dev_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
 
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset
  2016-06-12 14:05 [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2016-06-16 20:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  2016-06-27 14:04   ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jarkko Sakkinen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-06-16 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sudip Mukherjee
  Cc: Peter Huewe, Marcel Selhorst, Jason Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, tpmdd-devel

On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:05:29PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling put_device() to
> free the resources allocated. Lets use the helper
> devm_add_action_or_reset() and return directly in case of error, as we
> know that the cleanup function has been already called by the helper if
> there was any error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>

Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

/Jarkko

> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index 1965dc7..5a2f043 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@ -213,11 +213,11 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpmm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
>  	if (IS_ERR(chip))
>  		return chip;
>  
> -	rc = devm_add_action(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device, &chip->dev);
> -	if (rc) {
> -		put_device(&chip->dev);
> +	rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(pdev,
> +				      (void (*)(void *)) put_device,
> +				      &chip->dev);
> +	if (rc)
>  		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> -	}
>  
>  	dev_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset
  2016-06-16 20:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
@ 2016-06-27 14:04   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-06-27 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sudip Mukherjee; +Cc: tpmdd-devel, linux-kernel, linux-security-module

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 03:05:29PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling put_device() to
> > free the resources allocated. Lets use the helper
> > devm_add_action_or_reset() and return directly in case of error, as we
> > know that the cleanup function has been already called by the helper if
> > there was any error.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>

Applied to master.

/Jarkko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset
  2016-04-26  8:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
@ 2016-04-30 17:00   ` Sudip Mukherjee
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2016-04-30 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jarkko Sakkinen
  Cc: Peter Huewe, Marcel Selhorst, Jason Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, tpmdd-devel

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:30:14AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function
> > in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset()
> > and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper.
> 
> Have you verified that this compiles against my tree?

This was done against linux-next. But now I have just rebased against
the charmisc tree and sent v2. Also added the Reviewed-by tag to it.
(hope thats ok)

regards
sudip

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset
  2016-04-25 20:46 Sudip Mukherjee
  2016-04-25 20:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2016-04-26  8:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  2016-04-30 17:00   ` Sudip Mukherjee
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2016-04-26  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sudip Mukherjee
  Cc: Peter Huewe, Marcel Selhorst, Jason Gunthorpe, linux-kernel, tpmdd-devel

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function
> in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset()
> and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper.

Have you verified that this compiles against my tree?

/Jarkko

> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> index 5bc530c..aca4505 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
> @@ -212,11 +212,10 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpmm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
>  	if (IS_ERR(chip))
>  		return chip;
>  
> -	rc = devm_add_action(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device, &chip->dev);
> -	if (rc) {
> -		put_device(&chip->dev);
> +	rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device,
> +				      &chip->dev);
> +	if (rc)
>  		return ERR_PTR(rc);
> -	}
>  
>  	dev_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset
  2016-04-25 20:46 Sudip Mukherjee
@ 2016-04-25 20:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2016-04-26  8:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2016-04-25 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sudip Mukherjee
  Cc: Peter Huewe, Marcel Selhorst, Jarkko Sakkinen, linux-kernel, tpmdd-devel

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:46:38PM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function
> in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset()
> and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper.

Seems reasonable to me.

Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset
@ 2016-04-25 20:46 Sudip Mukherjee
  2016-04-25 20:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
  2016-04-26  8:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2016-04-25 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Huewe, Marcel Selhorst, Jarkko Sakkinen, Jason Gunthorpe
  Cc: linux-kernel, tpmdd-devel, Sudip Mukherjee

If devm_add_action() fails we are explicitly calling the cleanup function
in the error path. Lets use the helper function devm_add_action_or_reset()
and return directly as we know the cleanup has been done by the helper.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
index 5bc530c..aca4505 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
@@ -212,11 +212,10 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpmm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
 	if (IS_ERR(chip))
 		return chip;
 
-	rc = devm_add_action(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device, &chip->dev);
-	if (rc) {
-		put_device(&chip->dev);
+	rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(pdev, (void (*)(void *)) put_device,
+				      &chip->dev);
+	if (rc)
 		return ERR_PTR(rc);
-	}
 
 	dev_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
 
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-27 14:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-12 14:05 [PATCH] tpm: use devm_add_action_or_reset Sudip Mukherjee
2016-06-16 20:28 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-06-27 14:04   ` [tpmdd-devel] " Jarkko Sakkinen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-25 20:46 Sudip Mukherjee
2016-04-25 20:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-04-26  8:30 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2016-04-30 17:00   ` Sudip Mukherjee

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).