linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Redmond <u93410091@gmail.com>,
	"ZhaoJunmin Zhao(Junmin)" <zhaojunmin@huawei.com>,
	Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>,
	Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>,
	Sangwoo Park <sangwoo2.park@lge.com>,
	Chan Gyun Jeong <chan.jeong@lge.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/3] per-process reclaim
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:50:55 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1465804259-29345-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> (raw)

Hi all,

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1480728

I sent per-process reclaim patchset three years ago. Then, last
feedback from akpm was that he want to know real usecase scenario.

Since then, I got question from several embedded people of various
company "why it's not merged into mainline" and heard they have used
the feature as in-house patch and recenlty, I noticed android from
Qualcomm started to use it.

Of course, our product have used it and released it in real procuct.

Quote from Sangwoo Park <angwoo2.park@lge.com>
Thanks for the data, Sangwoo!
"
- Test scenaro
  - platform: android
  - target: MSM8952, 2G DDR, 16G eMMC
  - scenario
    retry app launch and Back Home with 16 apps and 16 turns
    (total app launch count is 256)
  - result:
			  resume count   |  cold launching count
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 vanilla           |           85        |          171
 perproc reclaim   |           184       |           72
"

Higher resume count is better because cold launching needs loading
lots of resource data which takes above 15 ~ 20 seconds for some
games while successful resume just takes 1~5 second.

As perproc reclaim way with new management policy, we could reduce
cold launching a lot(i.e., 171-72) so that it reduces app startup
a lot.

Another useful function from this feature is to make swapout easily
which is useful for testing swapout stress and workloads.

Thanks.

Cc: Redmond <u93410091@gmail.com>
Cc: ZhaoJunmin Zhao(Junmin) <zhaojunmin@huawei.com>
Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Juneho Choi <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: Sangwoo Park <sangwoo2.park@lge.com>
Cc: Chan Gyun Jeong <chan.jeong@lge.com>

Minchan Kim (3):
  mm: vmscan: refactoring force_reclaim
  mm: vmscan: shrink_page_list with multiple zones
  mm: per-process reclaim

 Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt |  15 ++++
 fs/proc/base.c                     |   1 +
 fs/proc/internal.h                 |   1 +
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c                 | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/rmap.h               |   4 +
 mm/vmscan.c                        |  85 ++++++++++++++++-----
 6 files changed, 235 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.1

             reply	other threads:[~2016-06-13  7:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-13  7:50 Minchan Kim [this message]
2016-06-13  7:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] mm: vmscan: refactoring force_reclaim Minchan Kim
2016-06-13  7:50 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] mm: vmscan: shrink_page_list with multiple zones Minchan Kim
2016-06-13  7:50 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] mm: per-process reclaim Minchan Kim
2016-06-13 15:06   ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-15  0:40     ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-16 11:07       ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-16 14:41       ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-17  6:43         ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-17  7:24     ` Balbir Singh
2016-06-17  7:57       ` Vinayak Menon
2016-06-13 17:06   ` Rik van Riel
2016-06-15  1:01     ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-13 11:50 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] " Chen Feng
2016-06-13 12:22   ` ZhaoJunmin Zhao(Junmin)
2016-06-15  0:43   ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-13 13:29 ` Vinayak Menon
2016-06-15  0:57   ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-16  4:21     ` Vinayak Menon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1465804259-29345-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chan.jeong@lge.com \
    --cc=juno.choi@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sangwoo2.park@lge.com \
    --cc=u93410091@gmail.com \
    --cc=vinmenon@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=zhaojunmin@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).