From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752092AbcFNPoH (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:44:07 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:38513 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751221AbcFNPoF (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:44:05 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,471,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="987281857" Message-ID: <1465919118.30123.73.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver From: Andy Shevchenko To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Mika Westerberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Cohen , Peter Zijlstra Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 18:45:18 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20160614152911.GB28601@gmail.com> References: <1465849087-54528-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20160614104355.GC13439@gmail.com> <1465912766.30123.55.camel@linux.intel.com> <20160614152911.GB28601@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or twice > > in some  > > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't like to > > use PMC  > > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other > > variation of  > > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms. > > > > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power Management > > framework  > > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which will > > have its own  > > driver in the future, so, can't use it either. > > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit) — > > one of them? > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps? Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'. P.S. I have sent an indentation fix as a separate patch. -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy