linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
@ 2016-06-13 20:18 Andy Shevchenko
  2016-06-14 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2016-06-13 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Bjorn Helgaas,
	linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel, David Cohen
  Cc: Andy Shevchenko

Add Power Management Unit driver to handle power states of South Complex
devices on Intel Tangier. In the future it might be expanded to cover North
Complex devices as well.

With this driver the power state of the host controllers such as SPI, I2C,
UART, eMMC, and DMA would be managed.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h     |   8 +
 arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c         |  35 +++-
 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/Makefile |   2 +-
 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c    | 392 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/pci/Makefile                 |   3 +
 drivers/pci/pci-mid.c                |  77 +++++++
 6 files changed, 515 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pci-mid.c

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h
index 7c5af12..0941497 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h
@@ -12,9 +12,17 @@
 #define _ASM_X86_INTEL_MID_H
 
 #include <linux/sfi.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
 extern int intel_mid_pci_init(void);
+int intel_mid_pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_power_t state);
+
+#define INTEL_MID_PMU_LSS_OFFSET	4
+#define INTEL_MID_PMU_LSS_TYPE		(1 << 7)
+
+int intel_mid_pmu_get_lss_id(struct pci_dev *pdev);
+
 extern int get_gpio_by_name(const char *name);
 extern void intel_scu_device_register(struct platform_device *pdev);
 extern int __init sfi_parse_mrtc(struct sfi_table_header *table);
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c b/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c
index ae97f24..399c9d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c
@@ -316,15 +316,48 @@ static void pci_d3delay_fixup(struct pci_dev *dev)
 }
 DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID, pci_d3delay_fixup);
 
-static void mrst_power_off_unused_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
+static void mid_power_off_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
+	u16 pmcsr;
+
+	/*
+	 * Update current state first, otherwise PCI core enforces PCI_D0 in
+	 * pci_set_power_state() for devices which status was PCI_UNKNOWN.
+	 */
+	pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, &pmcsr);
+	dev->current_state = (pci_power_t __force)(pmcsr & PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK);
+
 	pci_set_power_state(dev, PCI_D3hot);
 }
+
+static void mrst_power_off_unused_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	mid_power_off_dev(dev);
+}
 DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0801, mrst_power_off_unused_dev);
 DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0809, mrst_power_off_unused_dev);
 DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x080C, mrst_power_off_unused_dev);
 DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0815, mrst_power_off_unused_dev);
 
+static void mrfld_power_off_unused_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	int id;
+
+	if (!pci_soc_mode)
+		return;
+
+	id = intel_mid_pmu_get_lss_id(dev);
+	if (id < 0)
+		return;
+
+	/*
+	 * This sets only PMCSR bits. The actual power off will happen in
+	 * arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c.
+	 */
+	mid_power_off_dev(dev);
+}
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID, mrfld_power_off_unused_dev);
+
 /*
  * Langwell devices reside at fixed offsets, don't try to move them.
  */
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/Makefile b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/Makefile
index 0ce1b19..b89d150 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-obj-$(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID) += intel-mid.o intel_mid_vrtc.o mfld.o mrfl.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID) += intel-mid.o intel_mid_vrtc.o mfld.o mrfl.o pmu.o
 
 # SFI specific code
 ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ad279dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,392 @@
+/*
+ * Intel MID Power Management Unit device driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * Author: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
+ * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/types.h>
+
+#include <asm/intel-mid.h>
+
+/* Registers */
+#define PM_STS		0x00
+#define PM_CMD		0x04
+#define PM_ICS		0x08
+#define PM_WKC(x)	(0x10 + (x) * 4)
+#define PM_WKS(x)	(0x18 + (x) * 4)
+#define PM_SSC(x)	(0x20 + (x) * 4)
+#define PM_SSS(x)	(0x30 + (x) * 4)
+
+/* Bits in PM_STS */
+#define PM_STS_BUSY		(1 << 8)
+
+/* Bits in PM_CMD */
+#define PM_CMD_CMD(x)		((x) << 0)
+#define PM_CMD_IOC		(1 << 8)
+#define PM_CMD_D3cold		(1 << 21)
+
+/* List of commands */
+#define CMD_SET_CFG		0x01
+
+/* Bits in PM_ICS */
+#define PM_ICS_INT_STATUS(x)	((x) & 0xff)
+#define PM_ICS_IE		(1 << 8)
+#define PM_ICS_IP		(1 << 9)
+#define PM_ICS_SW_INT_STS	(1 << 10)
+
+/* List of interrupts */
+#define INT_INVALID		0
+#define INT_CMD_COMPLETE	1
+#define INT_CMD_ERR		2
+#define INT_WAKE_EVENT		3
+#define INT_LSS_POWER_ERR	4
+#define INT_S0iX_MSG_ERR	5
+#define INT_NO_C6		6
+#define INT_TRIGGER_ERR		7
+#define INT_INACTIVITY		8
+
+/* South Complex devices */
+#define LSS_MAX_SHARED_DEVS		4
+#define LSS_MAX_DEVS			64
+
+#define LSS_WS_BITS			1	/* wake state width */
+#define LSS_PWS_BITS			2	/* power state width */
+
+/* Supported device IDs */
+#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TANGIER		0x11a1
+
+struct mid_pmu_dev {
+	struct pci_dev *pdev;
+	pci_power_t state;
+};
+
+struct mid_pmu {
+	struct device *dev;
+	void __iomem *regs;
+	int irq;
+	bool available;
+
+	struct mutex lock;
+	struct mid_pmu_dev lss[LSS_MAX_DEVS][LSS_MAX_SHARED_DEVS];
+};
+
+static struct mid_pmu *midpmu;
+
+static u32 mid_pmu_get_state(struct mid_pmu *pmu, int reg)
+{
+	return readl(pmu->regs + PM_SSS(reg));
+}
+
+static void mid_pmu_set_state(struct mid_pmu *pmu, int reg, u32 value)
+{
+	writel(value, pmu->regs + PM_SSC(reg));
+}
+
+static void mid_pmu_set_wake(struct mid_pmu *pmu, int reg, u32 value)
+{
+	writel(value, pmu->regs + PM_WKC(reg));
+}
+
+static void mid_pmu_interrupt_disable(struct mid_pmu *pmu)
+{
+	writel(~PM_ICS_IE, pmu->regs + PM_ICS);
+}
+
+static bool mid_pmu_is_busy(struct mid_pmu *pmu)
+{
+	return !!(readl(pmu->regs + PM_STS) & PM_STS_BUSY);
+}
+
+/* Wait 500ms that the latest PMU command finished */
+static int mid_pmu_wait(struct mid_pmu *pmu)
+{
+	unsigned int count = 500000;
+	bool busy;
+
+	do {
+		busy = mid_pmu_is_busy(pmu);
+		if (!busy)
+			return 0;
+		udelay(1);
+	} while (--count);
+
+	return -EBUSY;
+}
+
+static int mid_pmu_wait_for_cmd(struct mid_pmu *pmu, u8 cmd)
+{
+	writel(PM_CMD_CMD(cmd), pmu->regs + PM_CMD);
+	return mid_pmu_wait(pmu);
+}
+
+static int __update_power_state(struct mid_pmu *pmu, int reg, int bit, int new)
+{
+	int curstate;
+	u32 power;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Check if the device is already in desired state */
+	power = mid_pmu_get_state(pmu, reg);
+	curstate = (power >> bit) & 3;
+	if (curstate == new)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Update the power state */
+	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, reg, (power & ~(3 << bit)) | (new << bit));
+
+	/* Send command to SCU */
+	ret = mid_pmu_wait_for_cmd(pmu, CMD_SET_CFG);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Check if the device is already in desired state */
+	power = mid_pmu_get_state(pmu, reg);
+	curstate = (power >> bit) & 3;
+	if (curstate != new)
+		return -EAGAIN;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static pci_power_t __find_weakest_power_state(struct mid_pmu_dev *lss,
+					      struct pci_dev *pdev,
+					      pci_power_t state)
+{
+	pci_power_t weakest = PCI_D3hot;
+	unsigned int j;
+
+	/* Find device in cache or first free cell */
+	for (j = 0; j < LSS_MAX_SHARED_DEVS; j++)
+		if (lss[j].pdev == pdev || !lss[j].pdev)
+			break;
+
+	/* Store the desired state in cache */
+	if (j < LSS_MAX_SHARED_DEVS) {
+		lss[j].pdev = pdev;
+		lss[j].state = state;
+	} else {
+		dev_WARN(&pdev->dev, "No room for device in PMU LSS cache\n");
+		weakest = state;
+	}
+
+	/* Find the power state we may use */
+	for (j = 0; j < LSS_MAX_SHARED_DEVS; j++)
+		if (lss[j].state < weakest)
+			weakest = lss[j].state;
+
+	return weakest;
+}
+
+static int __set_power_state(struct mid_pmu *pmu, struct pci_dev *pdev,
+			     pci_power_t state, int id, int reg, int bit)
+{
+	const char *name;
+	int ret;
+
+	state = __find_weakest_power_state(pmu->lss[id], pdev, state);
+	name = pci_power_name(state);
+
+	ret = __update_power_state(pmu, reg, bit, (__force int)state);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Can't set power state %s: %d\n", name, ret);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	dev_vdbg(&pdev->dev, "Set power state %s\n", name);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mid_pmu_set_power_state(struct mid_pmu *pmu, struct pci_dev *pdev,
+				   pci_power_t state)
+{
+	int id, reg, bit;
+	int ret;
+
+	id = intel_mid_pmu_get_lss_id(pdev);
+	if (id < 0)
+		return id;
+
+	reg = (id * LSS_PWS_BITS) / 32;
+	bit = (id * LSS_PWS_BITS) % 32;
+
+	/* We support states between PCI_D0 and PCI_D3hot */
+	if (state < PCI_D0)
+		state = PCI_D0;
+	if (state > PCI_D3hot)
+		state = PCI_D3hot;
+
+	mutex_lock(&pmu->lock);
+	ret = __set_power_state(pmu, pdev, state, id, reg, bit);
+	mutex_unlock(&pmu->lock);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int intel_mid_pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_power_t state)
+{
+	struct mid_pmu *pmu = midpmu;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	might_sleep();
+
+	if (pmu && pmu->available)
+		ret = mid_pmu_set_power_state(pmu, pdev, state);
+	dev_vdbg(&pdev->dev, "set_power_state() returns %d\n", ret);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_mid_pci_set_power_state);
+
+int intel_mid_pmu_get_lss_id(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+	int vndr;
+	u8 id;
+
+	/*
+	 * Mapping to PMU index is kept in the Logical SubSystem ID byte of
+	 * Vendor capability.
+	 */
+	vndr = pci_find_capability(pdev, PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR);
+	if (!vndr)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Read the Logical SubSystem ID byte */
+	pci_read_config_byte(pdev, vndr + INTEL_MID_PMU_LSS_OFFSET, &id);
+	if (!(id & INTEL_MID_PMU_LSS_TYPE))
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	id &= ~INTEL_MID_PMU_LSS_TYPE;
+	if (id >= LSS_MAX_DEVS)
+		return -ERANGE;
+
+	return id;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t mid_pmu_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+	struct mid_pmu *pmu = dev_id;
+	u32 ics;
+
+	ics = readl(pmu->regs + PM_ICS);
+	if (!(ics & PM_ICS_IP))
+		return IRQ_NONE;
+
+	writel(ics | PM_ICS_IP, pmu->regs + PM_ICS);
+
+	dev_warn(pmu->dev, "Unexpected IRQ: %#x\n", PM_ICS_INT_STATUS(ics));
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+struct mid_pmu_device_info {
+	int (*set_initial_state)(struct mid_pmu *pmu);
+};
+
+static int mid_pmu_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
+{
+	struct mid_pmu_device_info *info = (void *)id->driver_data;
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct mid_pmu *pmu;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = pcim_enable_device(pdev);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error: could not enable device\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, 1 << 0, pci_name(pdev));
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "I/O memory remapping failed\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	pmu = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pmu)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	pmu->dev = dev;
+	pmu->regs = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[0];
+	pmu->irq = pdev->irq;
+
+	mutex_init(&pmu->lock);
+
+	/* Disable interrupts */
+	mid_pmu_interrupt_disable(pmu);
+
+	if (info && info->set_initial_state) {
+		ret = info->set_initial_state(pmu);
+		if (ret)
+			dev_warn(dev, "Can't set initial state: %d\n", ret);
+	}
+
+	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, pdev->irq, mid_pmu_irq_handler,
+			       IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, pci_name(pdev), pmu);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	pmu->available = true;
+	midpmu = pmu;
+
+	pci_set_drvdata(pdev, pmu);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int tng_set_initial_state(struct mid_pmu *pmu)
+{
+	unsigned int i, j;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Enable wake events */
+	mid_pmu_set_wake(pmu, 0, 0xffffffff);
+	mid_pmu_set_wake(pmu, 1, 0xffffffff);
+
+	/* Power off unused devices */
+	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 0, 0xffffffff);
+	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 1, 0xffffffff);
+	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 2, 0xffffffff);
+	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 3, 0xffffffff);
+
+	/* Send command to SCU */
+	ret = mid_pmu_wait_for_cmd(pmu, CMD_SET_CFG);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < LSS_MAX_DEVS; i++)
+		for (j = 0; j < LSS_MAX_SHARED_DEVS; j++)
+			pmu->lss[i][j].state = PCI_D3hot;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct mid_pmu_device_info tng_info = {
+	.set_initial_state = tng_set_initial_state,
+};
+
+static const struct pci_device_id mid_pmu_pci_ids[] = {
+	{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_TANGIER), (kernel_ulong_t)&tng_info },
+	{}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, mid_pmu_pci_ids);
+
+static struct pci_driver mid_pmu_pci_driver = {
+	.name		= "intel_mid_pmu",
+	.probe		= mid_pmu_probe,
+	.id_table	= mid_pmu_pci_ids,
+};
+
+builtin_pci_driver(mid_pmu_pci_driver);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/Makefile b/drivers/pci/Makefile
index 1fa6925..8db5079 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/pci/Makefile
@@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI)    += pci-acpi.o
 # SMBIOS provided firmware instance and labels
 obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_LABEL) += pci-label.o
 
+# Intel MID platform PM support
+obj-$(CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID) += pci-mid.o
+
 obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_SYSCALL) += syscall.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_STUB) += pci-stub.o
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-mid.c b/drivers/pci/pci-mid.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4a34bd4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-mid.c
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+/*
+ * Intel MID platform PM support
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2016, Intel Corporation
+ *
+ * Author: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
+ * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
+
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
+#include <asm/intel-family.h>
+#include <asm/intel-mid.h>
+
+#include "pci.h"
+
+static bool mid_pci_power_manageable(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
+static int mid_pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_power_t state)
+{
+	return intel_mid_pci_set_power_state(pdev, state);
+}
+
+static pci_power_t mid_pci_choose_state(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+	return PCI_D3hot;
+}
+
+static int mid_pci_sleep_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int mid_pci_run_wake(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static bool mid_pci_need_resume(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+
+static struct pci_platform_pm_ops mid_pci_platform_pm = {
+	.is_manageable = mid_pci_power_manageable,
+	.set_state = mid_pci_set_power_state,
+	.choose_state = mid_pci_choose_state,
+	.sleep_wake = mid_pci_sleep_wake,
+	.run_wake = mid_pci_run_wake,
+	.need_resume = mid_pci_need_resume,
+};
+
+#define ICPU(model)	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, }
+
+static const struct x86_cpu_id lpss_cpu_ids[] = {
+	ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_ATOM_MERRIFIELD1),
+	{}
+};
+
+static int __init mid_pci_init(void)
+{
+	const struct x86_cpu_id *id;
+
+	id = x86_match_cpu(lpss_cpu_ids);
+	if (id)
+		pci_set_platform_pm(&mid_pci_platform_pm);
+	return 0;
+}
+arch_initcall(mid_pci_init);
-- 
2.8.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-13 20:18 [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver Andy Shevchenko
@ 2016-06-14 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
  2016-06-14 13:59   ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2016-06-14 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Bjorn Helgaas,
	linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel, David Cohen,
	Peter Zijlstra


* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Add Power Management Unit driver to handle power states of South Complex
> devices on Intel Tangier. In the future it might be expanded to cover North
> Complex devices as well.
> 
> With this driver the power state of the host controllers such as SPI, I2C,
> UART, eMMC, and DMA would be managed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h     |   8 +
>  arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c         |  35 +++-
>  arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/Makefile |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c    | 392 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/pci/Makefile                 |   3 +
>  drivers/pci/pci-mid.c                |  77 +++++++
>  6 files changed, 515 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pci-mid.c

So this collides with perf's 'PMU' naming massively. Can we pick another name 
before hillarious kernel-wide confusion spreads?

how about intel/mid/pm.c plus renaming all the pmu* internal names to pm*?

We could call it 'power management interface', and in a single line mention that 
this is also a 'Power Management Unit' in Intel-speak?

>  extern int intel_mid_pci_init(void);
> +int intel_mid_pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_power_t state);
> +
> +#define INTEL_MID_PMU_LSS_OFFSET	4
> +#define INTEL_MID_PMU_LSS_TYPE		(1 << 7)
> +
> +int intel_mid_pmu_get_lss_id(struct pci_dev *pdev);

Yeah, so please be consistent about 'extern'.

Also, I had a look at the resulting arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h and the 
vertical alignments are all over the map.

Here is how it looks like:

#define FSB_FREQ_83SKU  83200
#define FSB_FREQ_100SKU 99840
#define FSB_FREQ_133SKU 133000

#define FSB_FREQ_167SKU 167000
#define FSB_FREQ_200SKU 200000
#define FSB_FREQ_267SKU 267000
#define FSB_FREQ_333SKU 333000
#define FSB_FREQ_400SKU 400000

/* Bus Select SoC Fuse value */
#define BSEL_SOC_FUSE_MASK      0x7
#define BSEL_SOC_FUSE_001       0x1 /* FSB 133MHz */
#define BSEL_SOC_FUSE_101       0x5 /* FSB 100MHz */
#define BSEL_SOC_FUSE_111       0x7 /* FSB 83MHz */

#define SFI_MTMR_MAX_NUM 8
#define SFI_MRTC_MAX    8

Can we please improve that?

> +
> +static void mrst_power_off_unused_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	mid_power_off_dev(dev);
> +}
>  DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0801, mrst_power_off_unused_dev);

So we add mrst_power_off_unused_dev() just to make it to mid_power_off_dev()?

Also, newlines ran out when the above bit was written.

> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,392 @@
> +/*
> + * Intel MID Power Management Unit device driver

Could we please write a bit longer description about what this driver does, what 
interfaces/capabilities it enables, etc.? People like the warm fuzzy feeling 
associated with knowing what's going on.

> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>

Was that types.h include really needed?

> +/* Registers */
> +#define PM_STS		0x00
> +#define PM_CMD		0x04
> +#define PM_ICS		0x08
> +#define PM_WKC(x)	(0x10 + (x) * 4)
> +#define PM_WKS(x)	(0x18 + (x) * 4)
> +#define PM_SSC(x)	(0x20 + (x) * 4)
> +#define PM_SSS(x)	(0x30 + (x) * 4)
> +
> +/* Bits in PM_STS */
> +#define PM_STS_BUSY		(1 << 8)
> +
> +/* Bits in PM_CMD */
> +#define PM_CMD_CMD(x)		((x) << 0)
> +#define PM_CMD_IOC		(1 << 8)
> +#define PM_CMD_D3cold		(1 << 21)
> +
> +/* List of commands */
> +#define CMD_SET_CFG		0x01
> +
> +/* Bits in PM_ICS */
> +#define PM_ICS_INT_STATUS(x)	((x) & 0xff)
> +#define PM_ICS_IE		(1 << 8)
> +#define PM_ICS_IP		(1 << 9)
> +#define PM_ICS_SW_INT_STS	(1 << 10)
> +
> +/* List of interrupts */
> +#define INT_INVALID		0
> +#define INT_CMD_COMPLETE	1
> +#define INT_CMD_ERR		2
> +#define INT_WAKE_EVENT		3
> +#define INT_LSS_POWER_ERR	4
> +#define INT_S0iX_MSG_ERR	5
> +#define INT_NO_C6		6
> +#define INT_TRIGGER_ERR		7
> +#define INT_INACTIVITY		8
> +
> +/* South Complex devices */
> +#define LSS_MAX_SHARED_DEVS		4
> +#define LSS_MAX_DEVS			64
> +
> +#define LSS_WS_BITS			1	/* wake state width */
> +#define LSS_PWS_BITS			2	/* power state width */
> +
> +/* Supported device IDs */
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TANGIER		0x11a1

Again essentially randomized vertical alignment. Is anyone supposed to read this 
code?

> +	/* Find device in cache or first free cell */
> +	for (j = 0; j < LSS_MAX_SHARED_DEVS; j++)
> +		if (lss[j].pdev == pdev || !lss[j].pdev)
> +			break;

... missing curly braces. That's a problem in other places as well, please fix all 
of them.

> +static int tng_set_initial_state(struct mid_pmu *pmu)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i, j;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Enable wake events */
> +	mid_pmu_set_wake(pmu, 0, 0xffffffff);
> +	mid_pmu_set_wake(pmu, 1, 0xffffffff);
> +
> +	/* Power off unused devices */
> +	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 0, 0xffffffff);
> +	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 1, 0xffffffff);
> +	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 2, 0xffffffff);
> +	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 3, 0xffffffff);

What are these magic numbers of 0/1/2/3?

> +static struct pci_driver mid_pmu_pci_driver = {
> +	.name		= "intel_mid_pmu",
> +	.probe		= mid_pmu_probe,
> +	.id_table	= mid_pmu_pci_ids,
> +};

This structure initialization has a nice vertical layout.

> +static struct pci_platform_pm_ops mid_pci_platform_pm = {
> +	.is_manageable = mid_pci_power_manageable,
> +	.set_state = mid_pci_set_power_state,
> +	.choose_state = mid_pci_choose_state,
> +	.sleep_wake = mid_pci_sleep_wake,
> +	.run_wake = mid_pci_run_wake,
> +	.need_resume = mid_pci_need_resume,
> +};

This one, not so much.

Thanks,

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-14 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2016-06-14 13:59   ` Andy Shevchenko
  2016-06-14 15:29     ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2016-06-14 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Bjorn Helgaas,
	linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel, David Cohen,
	Peter Zijlstra

On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add Power Management Unit driver to handle power states of South
> > Complex
> > devices on Intel Tangier. In the future it might be expanded to
> > cover North
> > Complex devices as well.
> > 
> > With this driver the power state of the host controllers such as
> > SPI, I2C,
> > UART, eMMC, and DMA would be managed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h     |   8 +
> >  arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c         |  35 +++-
> >  arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/Makefile |   2 +-
> >  arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c    | 392
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/pci/Makefile                 |   3 +
> >  drivers/pci/pci-mid.c                |  77 +++++++
> >  6 files changed, 515 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pci-mid.c
> 
> So this collides with perf's 'PMU' naming massively. Can we pick
> another name 
> before hillarious kernel-wide confusion spreads?
> 
> how about intel/mid/pm.c plus renaming all the pmu* internal names to
> pm*?
> 
> We could call it 'power management interface', and in a single line
> mention that 
> this is also a 'Power Management Unit' in Intel-speak?

In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or twice in
some documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't like
to use PMC abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many
other variation of existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.

PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power Management
framework in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which
will have its own driver in the future, so, can't use it either.

pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit) — one
of them?

> 
> >  extern int intel_mid_pci_init(void);
> > +int intel_mid_pci_set_power_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, pci_power_t
> > state);
> > +
> > +#define INTEL_MID_PMU_LSS_OFFSET	4
> > +#define INTEL_MID_PMU_LSS_TYPE		(1 << 7)
> > +
> > +int intel_mid_pmu_get_lss_id(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> 
> Yeah, so please be consistent about 'extern'.

Ok.

> 
> Also, I had a look at the resulting arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h
> and the 
> vertical alignments are all over the map.
> 
> Here is how it looks like:
> 
> #define FSB_FREQ_83SKU  83200
> #define FSB_FREQ_100SKU 99840
> #define FSB_FREQ_133SKU 133000
> 
> #define FSB_FREQ_167SKU 167000
> #define FSB_FREQ_200SKU 200000
> #define FSB_FREQ_267SKU 267000
> #define FSB_FREQ_333SKU 333000
> #define FSB_FREQ_400SKU 400000
> 
> /* Bus Select SoC Fuse value */
> #define BSEL_SOC_FUSE_MASK      0x7
> #define BSEL_SOC_FUSE_001       0x1 /* FSB 133MHz */
> #define BSEL_SOC_FUSE_101       0x5 /* FSB 100MHz */
> #define BSEL_SOC_FUSE_111       0x7 /* FSB 83MHz */
> 
> #define SFI_MTMR_MAX_NUM 8
> #define SFI_MRTC_MAX    8
> 
> Can we please improve that?

Sure, I can cook a separate patch.

> 
> > +
> > +static void mrst_power_off_unused_dev(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > +{
> > +	mid_power_off_dev(dev);
> > +}
> >  DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x0801,
> > mrst_power_off_unused_dev);
> 
> So we add mrst_power_off_unused_dev() just to make it to
> mid_power_off_dev()?

For now. Perhaps I can just rename and extend current function. What do
you prefer?

> 
> Also, newlines ran out when the above bit was written.

Got it.

> 
> > +++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,392 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Intel MID Power Management Unit device driver
> 
> Could we please write a bit longer description about what this driver
> does, what 
> interfaces/capabilities it enables, etc.? People like the warm fuzzy
> feeling 
> associated with knowing what's going on.

I will add a few lines to describe it.

> 
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> 
> Was that types.h include really needed?

I played with bitmaps earlier, looks like leftover.

> 
> > +/* Registers */
> > +#define PM_STS		0x00
> > +#define PM_CMD		0x04
> > +#define PM_ICS		0x08
> > +#define PM_WKC(x)	(0x10 + (x) * 4)
> > +#define PM_WKS(x)	(0x18 + (x) * 4)
> > +#define PM_SSC(x)	(0x20 + (x) * 4)
> > +#define PM_SSS(x)	(0x30 + (x) * 4)
> > +
> > +/* Bits in PM_STS */
> > +#define PM_STS_BUSY		(1 << 8)
> > +
> > +/* Bits in PM_CMD */
> > +#define PM_CMD_CMD(x)		((x) << 0)
> > +#define PM_CMD_IOC		(1 << 8)
> > +#define PM_CMD_D3cold		(1 << 21)
> > +
> > +/* List of commands */
> > +#define CMD_SET_CFG		0x01
> > +
> > +/* Bits in PM_ICS */
> > +#define PM_ICS_INT_STATUS(x)	((x) & 0xff)
> > +#define PM_ICS_IE		(1 << 8)
> > +#define PM_ICS_IP		(1 << 9)
> > +#define PM_ICS_SW_INT_STS	(1 << 10)
> > +
> > +/* List of interrupts */
> > +#define INT_INVALID		0
> > +#define INT_CMD_COMPLETE	1
> > +#define INT_CMD_ERR		2
> > +#define INT_WAKE_EVENT		3
> > +#define INT_LSS_POWER_ERR	4
> > +#define INT_S0iX_MSG_ERR	5
> > +#define INT_NO_C6		6
> > +#define INT_TRIGGER_ERR		7
> > +#define INT_INACTIVITY		8
> > +
> > +/* South Complex devices */
> > +#define LSS_MAX_SHARED_DEVS		4
> > +#define LSS_MAX_DEVS			64
> > +
> > +#define LSS_WS_BITS			1	/* wake state
> > width */
> > +#define LSS_PWS_BITS			2	/* power state
> > width */
> > +
> > +/* Supported device IDs */
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_TANGIER		0x11a1
> 
> Again essentially randomized vertical alignment. Is anyone supposed to
> read this 
> code?

Anyone who wants to read it.

> 
> > +	/* Find device in cache or first free cell */
> > +	for (j = 0; j < LSS_MAX_SHARED_DEVS; j++)
> > +		if (lss[j].pdev == pdev || !lss[j].pdev)
> > +			break;
> 
> ... missing curly braces. That's a problem in other places as well,
> please fix all 
> of them.

Will do.

> 
> > +static int tng_set_initial_state(struct mid_pmu *pmu)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int i, j;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Enable wake events */
> > +	mid_pmu_set_wake(pmu, 0, 0xffffffff);
> > +	mid_pmu_set_wake(pmu, 1, 0xffffffff);
> > +
> > +	/* Power off unused devices */
> > +	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 0, 0xffffffff);
> > +	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 1, 0xffffffff);
> > +	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 2, 0xffffffff);
> > +	mid_pmu_set_state(pmu, 3, 0xffffffff);
> 
> What are these magic numbers of 0/1/2/3?

This is a map of 64 devices with 2 bits per each on 32-bit HW registers.
The mapping itself is provided by platform using vendor capability of
PCI configuration space. So, here is just a counter variable. No magic.
And I can't do more than already done in the register definition.

Should I put a comment here and at the top of the file about these bits
/ registers? 

> 
> > +static struct pci_driver mid_pmu_pci_driver = {
> > +	.name		= "intel_mid_pmu",
> > +	.probe		= mid_pmu_probe,
> > +	.id_table	= mid_pmu_pci_ids,
> > +};
> 
> This structure initialization has a nice vertical layout.
> 
> > +static struct pci_platform_pm_ops mid_pci_platform_pm = {
> > +	.is_manageable = mid_pci_power_manageable,
> > +	.set_state = mid_pci_set_power_state,
> > +	.choose_state = mid_pci_choose_state,
> > +	.sleep_wake = mid_pci_sleep_wake,
> > +	.run_wake = mid_pci_run_wake,
> > +	.need_resume = mid_pci_need_resume,
> > +};
> 
> This one, not so much.

Will fix this one.

Thank you for review!

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-14 13:59   ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2016-06-14 15:29     ` Ingo Molnar
  2016-06-14 15:45       ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2016-06-14 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Bjorn Helgaas,
	linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel, David Cohen,
	Peter Zijlstra


* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Add Power Management Unit driver to handle power states of South
> > > Complex
> > > devices on Intel Tangier. In the future it might be expanded to
> > > cover North
> > > Complex devices as well.
> > > 
> > > With this driver the power state of the host controllers such as
> > > SPI, I2C,
> > > UART, eMMC, and DMA would be managed.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/include/asm/intel-mid.h     |   8 +
> > >  arch/x86/pci/intel_mid_pci.c         |  35 +++-
> > >  arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/Makefile |   2 +-
> > >  arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c    | 392
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/pci/Makefile                 |   3 +
> > >  drivers/pci/pci-mid.c                |  77 +++++++
> > >  6 files changed, 515 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/pmu.c
> > >  create mode 100644 drivers/pci/pci-mid.c
> > 
> > So this collides with perf's 'PMU' naming massively. Can we pick
> > another name 
> > before hillarious kernel-wide confusion spreads?
> > 
> > how about intel/mid/pm.c plus renaming all the pmu* internal names to
> > pm*?
> > 
> > We could call it 'power management interface', and in a single line
> > mention that 
> > this is also a 'Power Management Unit' in Intel-speak?
> 
> In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or twice in some 
> documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't like to use PMC 
> abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other variation of 
> existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.
> 
> PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power Management framework 
> in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which will have its own 
> driver in the future, so, can't use it either.
> 
> pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit) — one of them?

'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?

Thanks,

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-14 15:29     ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2016-06-14 15:45       ` Andy Shevchenko
  2016-06-14 15:58         ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2016-06-14 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Bjorn Helgaas,
	linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel, David Cohen,
	Peter Zijlstra

On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or twice
> > in some 
> > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't like to
> > use PMC 
> > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other
> > variation of 
> > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.
> > 
> > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power Management
> > framework 
> > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which will
> > have its own 
> > driver in the future, so, can't use it either.
> > 
> > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit) —
> > one of them?
> 
> 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?

Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.

P.S. I have sent an indentation fix as a separate patch.

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-14 15:45       ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2016-06-14 15:58         ` Ingo Molnar
  2016-06-14 16:07           ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2016-06-14 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Bjorn Helgaas,
	linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel, David Cohen,
	Peter Zijlstra


* Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or twice
> > > in some 
> > > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't like to
> > > use PMC 
> > > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other
> > > variation of 
> > > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.
> > > 
> > > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power Management
> > > framework 
> > > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which will
> > > have its own 
> > > driver in the future, so, can't use it either.
> > > 
> > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit) —
> > > one of them?
> > 
> > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> 
> Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.

Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?

Thanks,

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-14 15:58         ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2016-06-14 16:07           ` Andy Shevchenko
  2016-06-14 17:26             ` David Cohen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2016-06-14 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar
  Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, Bjorn Helgaas,
	linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel, David Cohen,
	Peter Zijlstra

On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or
> > > > twice
> > > > in some 
> > > > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't
> > > > like to
> > > > use PMC 
> > > > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other
> > > > variation of 
> > > > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.
> > > > 
> > > > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power
> > > > Management
> > > > framework 
> > > > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which
> > > > will
> > > > have its own 
> > > > driver in the future, so, can't use it either.
> > > > 
> > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit)
> > > > —
> > > > one of them?
> > > 
> > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> > 
> > Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.
> 
> Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?

Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-14 16:07           ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2016-06-14 17:26             ` David Cohen
  2016-06-14 17:37               ` Andy Shevchenko
  2016-06-14 17:37               ` David Cohen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Cohen @ 2016-06-14 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86,
	Bjorn Helgaas, linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel,
	Peter Zijlstra

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 07:07:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or
> > > > > twice
> > > > > in some 
> > > > > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't
> > > > > like to
> > > > > use PMC 
> > > > > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other
> > > > > variation of 
> > > > > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.
> > > > > 
> > > > > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power
> > > > > Management
> > > > > framework 
> > > > > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which
> > > > > will
> > > > > have its own 
> > > > > driver in the future, so, can't use it either.
> > > > > 
> > > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit)
> > > > > —
> > > > > one of them?
> > > > 
> > > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> > > 
> > > Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.
> > 
> > Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?
> 
> Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.

I'm curious about that. What pmu prefix would stand for?

Br, David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-14 17:26             ` David Cohen
@ 2016-06-14 17:37               ` Andy Shevchenko
  2016-06-14 17:38                 ` David Cohen
  2016-06-14 17:37               ` David Cohen
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2016-06-14 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Cohen
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86,
	Bjorn Helgaas, linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel,
	Peter Zijlstra

On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 10:26 -0700, David Cohen wrote:

> > Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.
> 
> I'm curious about that. What pmu prefix would stand for?

It's indeed widely used as Performance Monitoring Unit

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-14 17:26             ` David Cohen
  2016-06-14 17:37               ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2016-06-14 17:37               ` David Cohen
  2016-06-14 17:48                 ` Andy Shevchenko
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Cohen @ 2016-06-14 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86,
	Bjorn Helgaas, linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel,
	Peter Zijlstra

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:26:21AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 07:07:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 17:29 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > * Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 12:43 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > > > > In the TRM it's called Power Management Unit, though once or
> > > > > > twice
> > > > > > in some 
> > > > > > documents as Power Management Controller. I actually woudn't
> > > > > > like to
> > > > > > use PMC 
> > > > > > abbreviation to not be confused with pmc_atom.c and many other
> > > > > > variation of 
> > > > > > existing PMC drivers of other Intel platforms.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > PM* as a prefix might be too short to conflict with Power
> > > > > > Management
> > > > > > framework 
> > > > > > in the kernel. P-Unit (punit*) is existing part in SoC which
> > > > > > will
> > > > > > have its own 
> > > > > > driver in the future, so, can't use it either.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management Unit)
> > > > > > —
> > > > > > one of them?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> > > > 
> > > > Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.
> > > 
> > > Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?
> > 
> > Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.
> 
> I'm curious about that. What pmu prefix would stand for?

Nevermind :)
I'd vote for pwmu, as it would make more sense WRT the hw
documentation.

Br, David

> 
> Br, David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-14 17:37               ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2016-06-14 17:38                 ` David Cohen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: David Cohen @ 2016-06-14 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86,
	Bjorn Helgaas, linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel,
	Peter Zijlstra

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 08:37:14PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 10:26 -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> 
> > > Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.
> > 
> > I'm curious about that. What pmu prefix would stand for?
> 
> It's indeed widely used as Performance Monitoring Unit

Thanks :)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver
  2016-06-14 17:37               ` David Cohen
@ 2016-06-14 17:48                 ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2016-06-14 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Cohen
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86,
	Bjorn Helgaas, linux-pci, Mika Westerberg, linux-kernel,
	Peter Zijlstra

On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 10:37 -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:26:21AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > 
> > > > > > > pwr*, pwrmu*, scpmu* (as of South Complex Power Management
> > > > > > > Unit)
> > > > > > > —
> > > > > > > one of them?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 'pwr' certainly sounds good to me! PWMU perhaps?
> > > > > 


> > > > > Wouldn't be a bit confusing with pwm? I would stay at 'pwr'.

^^^ (1)

> > > > 
> > > > Yeah, indeed - so pwr it is?
> > > 
> > > Yes. Will rename in this way, re-test and re-send.
> > 
> > I'm curious about that. What pmu prefix would stand for?
> 
> Nevermind :)
> I'd vote for pwmu, as it would make more sense WRT the hw
> documentation.

What about (1)?
Currently I renamed everything to pwr and it looks good.

-- 

Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-06-14 17:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-13 20:18 [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Add Power Management Unit driver Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 10:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 13:59   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 15:29     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 15:45       ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 15:58         ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 16:07           ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 17:26             ` David Cohen
2016-06-14 17:37               ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-06-14 17:38                 ` David Cohen
2016-06-14 17:37               ` David Cohen
2016-06-14 17:48                 ` Andy Shevchenko

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).