linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kan.liang@intel.com
To: davem@davemloft.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org,
	yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, gorcunov@openvz.org,
	john.stultz@linaro.org, aduyck@mirantis.com, ben@decadent.org.uk,
	decot@googlers.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
	andi@firstfloor.org, Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 07/30] net/netpolicy: create CPU and queue mapping
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 23:56:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468824984-65318-8-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468824984-65318-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>

Current implementation forces CPU and queue 1:1 mapping. This patch
introduces the function netpolicy_update_sys_map to create this mapping.
The result is stored in netpolicy_sys_info.
If the CPU count and queue count are different, the remaining
CPUs/queues are not used.
CPU hotplug, device hotplug or ethtool may change the CPU count or
queue count. For these cases, this function can also be called to
reconstruct the mapping. These cases will be handled later in this
series.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/netpolicy.h | 18 ++++++++++++
 net/core/netpolicy.c      | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/netpolicy.h b/include/linux/netpolicy.h
index fc87d9b..a946b75c 100644
--- a/include/linux/netpolicy.h
+++ b/include/linux/netpolicy.h
@@ -30,9 +30,27 @@ struct netpolicy_dev_info {
 	u32	*tx_irq;
 };
 
+struct netpolicy_sys_map {
+	u32	cpu;
+	u32	queue;
+	u32	irq;
+};
+
+struct netpolicy_sys_info {
+	/*
+	 * Record the cpu and queue 1:1 mapping
+	 */
+	u32				avail_rx_num;
+	struct netpolicy_sys_map	*rx;
+	u32				avail_tx_num;
+	struct netpolicy_sys_map	*tx;
+};
+
 struct netpolicy_info {
 	enum netpolicy_name	cur_policy;
 	unsigned long avail_policy[BITS_TO_LONGS(NET_POLICY_MAX)];
+	/* cpu and queue mapping information */
+	struct netpolicy_sys_info	sys_info;
 };
 
 #endif /*__LINUX_NETPOLICY_H*/
diff --git a/net/core/netpolicy.c b/net/core/netpolicy.c
index 075aaca..ff7fc04 100644
--- a/net/core/netpolicy.c
+++ b/net/core/netpolicy.c
@@ -54,6 +54,80 @@ static u32 netpolicy_get_cpu_information(void)
 	return num_online_cpus();
 }
 
+static void netpolicy_free_sys_map(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	struct netpolicy_sys_info *s_info = &dev->netpolicy->sys_info;
+
+	kfree(s_info->rx);
+	s_info->rx = NULL;
+	s_info->avail_rx_num = 0;
+	kfree(s_info->tx);
+	s_info->tx = NULL;
+	s_info->avail_tx_num = 0;
+}
+
+static int netpolicy_update_sys_map(struct net_device *dev,
+				    struct netpolicy_dev_info *d_info,
+				    u32 cpu)
+{
+	struct netpolicy_sys_info *s_info = &dev->netpolicy->sys_info;
+	u32 num, i, online_cpu;
+	cpumask_var_t cpumask;
+
+	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cpumask, GFP_ATOMIC))
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	/* update rx cpu map */
+	if (cpu > d_info->rx_num)
+		num = d_info->rx_num;
+	else
+		num = cpu;
+
+	s_info->avail_rx_num = num;
+	s_info->rx = kcalloc(num, sizeof(*s_info->rx), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!s_info->rx)
+		goto err;
+	cpumask_copy(cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+
+	i = 0;
+	for_each_cpu(online_cpu, cpumask) {
+		if (i == num)
+			break;
+		s_info->rx[i].cpu = online_cpu;
+		s_info->rx[i].queue = i;
+		s_info->rx[i].irq = d_info->rx_irq[i];
+		i++;
+	}
+
+	/* update tx cpu map */
+	if (cpu >= d_info->tx_num)
+		num = d_info->tx_num;
+	else
+		num = cpu;
+
+	s_info->avail_tx_num = num;
+	s_info->tx = kcalloc(num, sizeof(*s_info->tx), GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (!s_info->tx)
+		goto err;
+
+	i = 0;
+	for_each_cpu(online_cpu, cpumask) {
+		if (i == num)
+			break;
+		s_info->tx[i].cpu = online_cpu;
+		s_info->tx[i].queue = i;
+		s_info->tx[i].irq = d_info->tx_irq[i];
+		i++;
+	}
+
+	free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
+	return 0;
+err:
+	netpolicy_free_sys_map(dev);
+	free_cpumask_var(cpumask);
+	return -ENOMEM;
+}
+
 const char *policy_name[NET_POLICY_MAX] = {
 	"NONE"
 };
-- 
2.5.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-18  6:55 [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 01/30] net: introduce " kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 02/30] net/netpolicy: init " kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 03/30] i40e/netpolicy: Implement ndo_netpolicy_init kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 04/30] net/netpolicy: get driver information kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:55 ` [RFC PATCH 05/30] i40e/netpolicy: implement ndo_get_irq_info kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 06/30] net/netpolicy: get CPU information kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` kan.liang [this message]
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 08/30] net/netpolicy: set and remove irq affinity kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 09/30] net/netpolicy: enable and disable net policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 10/30] net/netpolicy: introduce netpolicy object kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 11/30] net/netpolicy: set net policy by policy name kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 12/30] i40e/netpolicy: implement ndo_set_net_policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 13/30] i40e/netpolicy: add three new net policies kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 14/30] net/netpolicy: add MIX policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 15/30] i40e/netpolicy: add MIX policy support kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 16/30] net/netpolicy: net device hotplug kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 17/30] net/netpolicy: support CPU hotplug kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 18/30] net/netpolicy: handle channel changes kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 19/30] net/netpolicy: implement netpolicy register kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 20/30] net/netpolicy: introduce per socket netpolicy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 21/30] net/policy: introduce netpolicy_pick_queue kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 22/30] net/netpolicy: set tx queues according to policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 23/30] i40e/ethtool: support RX_CLS_LOC_ANY kan.liang
2016-07-18 16:21   ` Alexander Duyck
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 24/30] net/netpolicy: set rx queues according to policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 25/30] net/netpolicy: introduce per task net policy kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 26/30] net/netpolicy: set per task policy by proc kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 27/30] net/netpolicy: fast path for finding the queues kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 28/30] net/netpolicy: optimize for queue pair kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 29/30] net/netpolicy: limit the total record number kan.liang
2016-07-18  6:56 ` [RFC PATCH 30/30] Documentation/networking: Document net policy kan.liang
2016-07-18 16:58   ` Randy Dunlap
2016-07-18 15:18 ` [RFC PATCH 00/30] Kernel NET policy Florian Westphal
2016-07-18 15:45   ` Andi Kleen
2016-07-18 17:52     ` Cong Wang
2016-07-18 20:14       ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 20:19         ` Cong Wang
2016-07-18 20:24           ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 19:04     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-07-18 19:43       ` Andi Kleen
2016-07-18 21:51         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2016-07-19  1:49           ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-19  5:03             ` David Miller
2016-07-19 13:43               ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 15:51   ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 16:17     ` Florian Westphal
2016-07-18 17:40       ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 16:34     ` Tom Herbert
2016-07-18 17:58       ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 16:22 ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-18 18:30   ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 20:51     ` Daniel Borkmann
2016-07-18 17:00 ` Alexander Duyck
2016-07-18 19:45   ` Liang, Kan
2016-07-18 19:49     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1468824984-65318-8-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com \
    --to=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=aduyck@mirantis.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=decot@googlers.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).