linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: dri-devel@lsits.freedesktop.org
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] dma-buf: Wait on the reservation object when sync'ing before CPU access
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 16:37:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471275425-30062-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466492640-12551-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Rendering operations to the dma-buf are tracked implicitly via the
reservation_object (dmabuf->resv). This is used to allow poll() to
wait upon outstanding rendering (or just query the current status of
rendering). The dma-buf sync ioctl allows userspace to prepare the
dma-buf for CPU access, which should include waiting upon rendering.
(Some drivers may need to do more work to ensure that the dma-buf mmap
is coherent as well as complete.)

v2: Always wait upon the reservation object implicitly. We choose to do
it after the native handler in case it can do so more efficiently.

Testcase: igt/prime_vgem
Testcase: igt/gem_concurrent_blit # *vgem*
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index ddaee60ae52a..cf04d249a6a4 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -586,6 +586,22 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_unmap_attachment);
 
+static int __dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
+				      enum dma_data_direction direction)
+{
+	bool write = (direction == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL ||
+		      direction == DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+	struct reservation_object *resv = dmabuf->resv;
+	long ret;
+
+	/* Wait on any implicit rendering fences */
+	ret = reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(resv, write, true,
+						  MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
 
 /**
  * dma_buf_begin_cpu_access - Must be called before accessing a dma_buf from the
@@ -608,6 +624,13 @@ int dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
 	if (dmabuf->ops->begin_cpu_access)
 		ret = dmabuf->ops->begin_cpu_access(dmabuf, direction);
 
+	/* Ensure that all fences are waited upon - but we first allow
+	 * the native handler the chance to do so more efficiently if it
+	 * chooses. A double invocation here will be reasonably cheap no-op.
+	 */
+	if (ret == 0)
+		ret = __dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(dmabuf, direction);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_begin_cpu_access);
-- 
2.8.1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-15 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-21  7:04 [PATCH] dma-buf: Wait on the reservation object when sync'ing before CPU access Chris Wilson
2016-06-21  8:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-08-15 15:37 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2016-08-15 15:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2016-08-15 16:02   ` Daniel Vetter
2016-12-19  1:40     ` Inki Dae
2016-12-19 10:23       ` Chris Wilson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1471275425-30062-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lsits.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).