From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754719AbcH2TBB (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:01:01 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0080.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.80]:37452 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750786AbcH2TBA (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:01:00 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2198:2199:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3351:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3870:3873:3874:4321:5007:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12219:12663:12740:13069:13095:13161:13181:13229:13311:13357:13439:14659:21080:21324:21433:30054:30064:30074:30091,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: truck45_2587474f60242 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1677 Message-ID: <1472497256.3425.81.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: checkkpatch (in)sanity ? From: Joe Perches To: Kalle Valo Cc: "Levin, Alexander" , Sasha Levin , Greg KH , LKML , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 12:00:56 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87lgzfihel.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <1472330452.26978.23.camel@perches.com> <20160828005636.GB19088@sasha-lappy> <1472348579.26978.47.camel@perches.com> <874m634yip.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <1472473855.3425.18.camel@perches.com> <87lgzfihel.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.2-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2016-08-29 at 21:01 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > there's now quite a > difference with checkpatch parameters what other people use and what I > use. [] > I find checkpatch very useful to maintain certain coding style in ath10k > and I don't need to worry small details like whitespace. I just need to > disable some of the warnings so that they don't hide the real warnings > I'm interested about. I don't see a conflict here. The entire point of classifying all of those checkpatch message types was to allow exactly what you are doing.