From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1422642AbcIGMRy (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 7 Sep 2016 08:17:54 -0400
Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:4946 "EHLO mga07.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1756987AbcIGMRv (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 7 Sep 2016 08:17:51 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,296,1470726000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="875975215"
Message-ID: <1473250666.11323.62.camel@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] gpio: pca953x: remove an unused variable
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>, Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>,
        Yong Li <yong.b.li@intel.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:17:46 +0300
In-Reply-To: <CAMpxmJULK+ayGU5RfkNJ8nOB6axBYknObCT-q94YuQD9abBC0w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1473240297-19881-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
         <1473240297-19881-5-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
         <1473248188.11323.40.camel@linux.intel.com>
         <CAMpxmJULK+ayGU5RfkNJ8nOB6axBYknObCT-q94YuQD9abBC0w@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5-1 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 13:40 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2016-09-07 13:36 GMT+02:00 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.in
> tel.com>:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 11:24 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > 
> > > The chip_type variable in struct pca953x_chip is no longer
> > > required.
> > > 
> > > Remove it.
> > 
> > Would it be patch 4 in the series?
> 
> Hi Andy,
> 
> I'm afraid I don't understand the question. Could you elaborate?

Same as for patch 1. This is not critical to have it before 5.
So, after rearrangement it would be 4th followed by 5th (aka patch 1 in
current series).

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy