From: riel@redhat.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, pbonzini@redhat.com,
mingo@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, bp@suse.de
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/5] x86,fpu: make FPU context switching much lazier
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 16:31:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1475353895-22175-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com> (raw)
This series is an attempt at making the x86 FPU context switching
code much lazier. By only reloading the FPU context when a task
switches to user mode, we can avoid switching FPU context for tasks
that spin in kernel mode, and avoid reloading the FPU context for
tasks that get interrupted by a kernel thread or briefly go idle.
It also allows us to skip restoring the userspace FPU context when
exiting a KVM guest.
This series is still BROKEN. The first 3 patches seem to work
fine in my tests (but should not, due to missing signal path
code), while the 4th test makes it easier to trigger bugs.
I am posting this to ask about obvious issues people may see,
ideas on what direction I should take this series in, and to
avoid code conflicts with Andy's plans wrt. lazy fpu mode.
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-01 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-01 20:31 riel [this message]
2016-10-01 20:31 ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] x86,fpu: split prev/next task fpu state handling riel
2016-10-01 23:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-02 0:02 ` Rik van Riel
2016-10-01 20:31 ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] x86,fpu: delay FPU register loading until switch to userspace riel
2016-10-01 23:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-02 0:08 ` Rik van Riel
2016-10-03 20:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-03 21:21 ` Rik van Riel
2016-10-03 21:36 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-04 1:29 ` Rik van Riel
2016-10-04 2:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-04 2:47 ` Rik van Riel
2016-10-04 3:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-04 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-10-04 12:48 ` Rik van Riel
2016-10-04 2:11 ` Rik van Riel
2016-10-04 3:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-10-02 0:42 ` Rik van Riel
2016-10-03 16:23 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-01 20:31 ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] x86,fpu: add kernel fpu argument to __kernel_fpu_begin riel
2016-10-01 20:31 ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] x86,fpu: lazily skip FPU restore when still loaded riel
2016-10-03 20:04 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-03 20:22 ` Rik van Riel
2016-10-03 20:49 ` Dave Hansen
2016-10-03 21:02 ` Rik van Riel
2016-10-01 20:31 ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] x86,fpu: kinda sorta fix up signal path riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1475353895-22175-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).