linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	hmh@hmh.eng.br
Subject: [PATCH] x86: Report Intel platform_id in /proc/cpuinfo
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:23:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1476833008-8293-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> (raw)

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

We have a need to distinguish systems based on their platform ID.
For example this is useful to distinguish systems with L4 cache
versus ones without.

There is a 3 bit identifier (also called processor flags) in
the IA32_PLATFORM_ID MSR that can give a more fine grained
identification of the CPU than just the model number/stepping.

IA32_PLATFORM_ID is architectural.

The MSR can be also accessed through /dev/cpu/*/msr, but that
requires root and is awkward.

The patch moves the reading of PLATFORM_INFO from the
(late) microcode driver code into the main intel CPU initialization
path and then also prints it in /proc/cpuinfo

v2: Handle 0 platform_id. Fix commit message.
v3: Move some code to cpu/intel.c
v4: Update description too.
v5: Move msr probe code out of line to workaround potential gcc 6 bug.
This fixes booting on all 0day systems.
Cc: hmh@hmh.eng.br
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h      |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c           | 15 +++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c |  8 ++------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c            |  2 ++
 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
index 63def9537a2d..c1313b3f3e59 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
 	/* Index into per_cpu list: */
 	u16			cpu_index;
 	u32			microcode;
+	u32			platform_id;
+	u8			has_platform_id;
 };
 
 #define X86_VENDOR_INTEL	0
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index fcd484d2bb03..7da7f008cee0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -61,6 +61,19 @@ void check_mpx_erratum(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	}
 }
 
+/* noinline to work around problem with gcc 6.2 */
+static noinline void probe_platformid(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
+{
+	if ((c->x86_model >= 5) || (c->x86 > 6)) {
+		unsigned val[2];
+
+		/* get processor flags from MSR 0x17 */
+		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID, val[0], val[1]);
+		c->platform_id = (val[1] >> 18) & 7;
+		c->has_platform_id = true;
+	}
+}
+
 static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 {
 	u64 misc_enable;
@@ -211,6 +224,8 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
 	}
 
 	check_mpx_erratum(c);
+
+	probe_platformid(c);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index cdc0deab00c9..fab07e49192e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -855,17 +855,13 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
 {
 	static struct cpu_signature prev;
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
-	unsigned int val[2];
 
 	memset(csig, 0, sizeof(*csig));
 
 	csig->sig = cpuid_eax(0x00000001);
 
-	if ((c->x86_model >= 5) || (c->x86 > 6)) {
-		/* get processor flags from MSR 0x17 */
-		rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID, val[0], val[1]);
-		csig->pf = 1 << ((val[1] >> 18) & 7);
-	}
+	if (c->has_platform_id)
+		csig->pf = 1 << c->platform_id;
 
 	csig->rev = c->microcode;
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index 18ca99f2798b..5345d50ed709 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		seq_puts(m, "stepping\t: unknown\n");
 	if (c->microcode)
 		seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode);
+	if (c->has_platform_id)
+		seq_printf(m, "platform_id\t: %d\n", c->platform_id);
 
 	if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
 		unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
-- 
2.5.5

             reply	other threads:[~2016-10-18 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-18 23:23 Andi Kleen [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-23 18:02 [PATCH] x86: Report Intel platform_id in /proc/cpuinfo Andi Kleen
2016-09-23  0:48 Andi Kleen
2016-09-23  8:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-06-02 15:51 Andi Kleen
2016-06-21 16:05 ` Andi Kleen
2016-06-22 11:54   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-09-21 12:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-05-31 21:24 Andi Kleen
2016-06-02 18:27 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2016-06-02 22:54   ` Andi Kleen
2016-05-05 10:12 Andi Kleen
2016-05-06 12:42 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1476833008-8293-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).