From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751687AbcKFU32 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 6 Nov 2016 15:29:28 -0500
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]:64395 "EHLO
        mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751093AbcKFU3T (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 6 Nov 2016 15:29:19 -0500
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@lists.linaro.org>,
        linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] vfs: Add timestamp range check support
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 21:28:37 +0100
Message-ID: <147897712.8Iuj6e9dPp@wuerfel>
User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-34-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CABeXuvoCANJohBWy4mpJFiYvJj0XNHKVpW1RWhXVrd9ZjT5FSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1478099096-25637-1-git-send-email-deepa.kernel@gmail.com> <1206C36E-9CB4-47B3-A891-8EA94C3220E0@dilger.ca> <CABeXuvoCANJohBWy4mpJFiYvJj0XNHKVpW1RWhXVrd9ZjT5FSQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:cYztH8GLSTGCIqD0wWylkpDKqHC5g3D/04KO+0IOaqeZwQgnJjU
 sXv7Of53dSlBax3ovbi+CA7UYUBY+vhQmrJld0aR4/OOsVmPA8HPIO+ky1kxcK/QKCsZqVu
 YLs0DLPg/z7IHDMgVAAcziTM90EaWUHtsJfo6v/mKWI/uyUYWUAujkL6ZcGpoO4OFbjlpon
 VjCUwlnTkY7Ht66HJ8/5w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:8SigVpB4A74=:jtZAwWmqzX6XSxUihP7kb+
 tiN8xV3VHBEq77yWQXmyWciyOMil5d4N3Ku3/h9/P4aAF2jzDn2HsTrW9QKU00jF9y3mC7cqr
 2Uej5YSReQrqzqD2Bg89aDimFyXWAd2/ARq3pD9YIqBHNQ87igOwIXzmFMYSx3coxO8d60T5f
 sR6b/jq3OfHjLYI8RVev8DKvbUbsMwIk0hRkS4MwysxIcoRLzM6pD8S9x5o2KWJWq7vqUXFCD
 KoVPSLBLeObukUZy3HF+mQIlAvgENzyndkbeAq+9z7CfdPzrQ3BlSnGPgvrJ2MZhyV9iMpuFH
 l8pgDKtp+3S0OWmh1XoqkClNqhgX/8C4gJ2hryFCMaMK9bSdUdCzsKQnt1WccRuCYYvKAZFSC
 nPEbFRqNuKW2yIQN8hBVBHYrB4PPXK5OPtLv5Q/dfCLYIrF4WjtVt7fWpUyEi9WLsi/iclD4I
 7R1WkFf5r23cUx29ywS0TbhmInDxH7RYSTdZpThuygPbAClD2n7oplLSI0D/WKUr+e6AIGITl
 qLITP0MdmPyaY4+zrowh/4NPVLxGdXjcvfF3NPbShQgfxhWzU/RjPvfw+R3XY5mK9eTf3dpyl
 /ePdX+L1krKuvudw0vrfRD9wBbsLcZc+/Ck+QQdkHKvhOxMIiLxJpw3grEQqmMNqR9JNoJSBC
 6YNkjvWo8I4mlf8sv6XSHhnc+zyb5uD53xaDBvDz5B1Sy/FAvdVFcP3HoDzYHmbrlhMniBqQN
 IFee1sIGjBYjVYkW
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sunday, November 6, 2016 9:44:33 AM CET Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> I will post xfs tests that validate mount and range checking.
> I will keep the policy same as what the RFC suggests for now.
> 
> Clamping can be verified once vfs is transitioned to using time64_t.

Won't it already work as expected on 64-bit architectures as they
have a 64-bit time_t?

	Arnd