From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby.prani@gmail.com, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/7] list: Split list_del() debug checking into separate function
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 09:55:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1479146133-23058-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161114175500.GA21637@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Similar to the list_add() debug consolidation, this commit consolidates
the debug checking performed during CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST into a new
__list_del_entry_valid() function, and stops list updates when corruption
is found.
Refactored from same hardening in PaX and Grsecurity.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/list.h | 15 +++++++++------
lib/list_debug.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
index b6da9b1dce4d..d1039ecaf94f 100644
--- a/include/linux/list.h
+++ b/include/linux/list.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ static inline void INIT_LIST_HEAD(struct list_head *list)
extern bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new,
struct list_head *prev,
struct list_head *next);
+extern bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry);
#else
static inline bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new,
struct list_head *prev,
@@ -39,6 +40,10 @@ static inline bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new,
{
return true;
}
+static inline bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry)
+{
+ return true;
+}
#endif
/*
@@ -106,22 +111,20 @@ static inline void __list_del(struct list_head * prev, struct list_head * next)
* Note: list_empty() on entry does not return true after this, the entry is
* in an undefined state.
*/
-#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST
static inline void __list_del_entry(struct list_head *entry)
{
+ if (!__list_del_entry_valid(entry))
+ return;
+
__list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
}
static inline void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
{
- __list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
+ __list_del_entry(entry);
entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;
}
-#else
-extern void __list_del_entry(struct list_head *entry);
-extern void list_del(struct list_head *entry);
-#endif
/**
* list_replace - replace old entry by new one
diff --git a/lib/list_debug.c b/lib/list_debug.c
index d0b89b9d0736..276565fca2a6 100644
--- a/lib/list_debug.c
+++ b/lib/list_debug.c
@@ -39,41 +39,34 @@ bool __list_add_valid(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *prev,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_add_valid);
-void __list_del_entry(struct list_head *entry)
+bool __list_del_entry_valid(struct list_head *entry)
{
struct list_head *prev, *next;
prev = entry->prev;
next = entry->next;
- if (WARN(next == LIST_POISON1,
- "list_del corruption, %p->next is LIST_POISON1 (%p)\n",
- entry, LIST_POISON1) ||
- WARN(prev == LIST_POISON2,
- "list_del corruption, %p->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%p)\n",
- entry, LIST_POISON2) ||
- WARN(prev->next != entry,
- "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
- "but was %p\n", entry, prev->next) ||
- WARN(next->prev != entry,
- "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
- "but was %p\n", entry, next->prev))
- return;
-
- __list_del(prev, next);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_del_entry);
+ if (unlikely(next == LIST_POISON1)) {
+ WARN(1, "list_del corruption, %p->next is LIST_POISON1 (%p)\n",
+ entry, LIST_POISON1);
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(prev == LIST_POISON2)) {
+ WARN(1, "list_del corruption, %p->prev is LIST_POISON2 (%p)\n",
+ entry, LIST_POISON2);
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(prev->next != entry)) {
+ WARN(1, "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, but was %p\n",
+ entry, prev->next);
+ return false;
+ }
+ if (unlikely(next->prev != entry)) {
+ WARN(1, "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, but was %p\n",
+ entry, next->prev);
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
-/**
- * list_del - deletes entry from list.
- * @entry: the element to delete from the list.
- * Note: list_empty on entry does not return true after this, the entry is
- * in an undefined state.
- */
-void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
-{
- __list_del_entry(entry);
- entry->next = LIST_POISON1;
- entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(list_del);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__list_del_entry_valid);
--
2.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-14 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-14 17:55 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/7] Security-related list changes for 4.10 Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-14 17:55 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/7] list: Split list_add() debug checking into separate function Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-14 17:55 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/7] rculist: Consolidate DEBUG_LIST for list_add_rcu() Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-14 17:55 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2016-11-14 17:55 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/7] bug: Provide toggle for BUG on data corruption Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-14 17:55 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/7] lkdtm: Add tests for struct list corruption Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-14 17:55 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/7] lib/Kconfig.debug: Fix typo in select statement Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-14 17:55 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 7/7] bug: Avoid Kconfig warning for BUG_ON_DATA_CORRUPTION Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1479146133-23058-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).