From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756580AbcKWJn5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2016 04:43:57 -0500 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:54700 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756484AbcKWJn3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2016 04:43:29 -0500 Message-ID: <1479894203.8964.29.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder From: Rick Chang To: Hans Verkuil CC: Hans Verkuil , Laurent Pinchart , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Matthias Brugger , "Rob Herring" , , , , , , , Minghsiu Tsai Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 17:43:23 +0800 In-Reply-To: <1479866054.8964.21.camel@mtksdaap41> References: <1479353915-5043-1-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479353915-5043-4-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479784905.8964.15.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479866054.8964.21.camel@mtksdaap41> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 09:54 +0800, Rick Chang wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 13:43 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > On 22/11/16 04:21, Rick Chang wrote: > > > Hi Hans, > > > > > > On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > >> On 17/11/16 04:38, Rick Chang wrote: > > >>> Signed-off-by: Rick Chang > > >>> Signed-off-by: Minghsiu Tsai > > >>> --- > > >>> This patch depends on: > > >>> CCF "Add clock support for Mediatek MT2701"[1] > > >>> iommu and smi "Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701"[2] > > >>> > > >>> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-October/007271.html > > >>> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9164013/ > > >> > > >> I assume that 1 & 2 will appear in 4.10? So this patch needs to go in > > >> after the > > >> other two are merged in 4.10? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Hans > > > > > > [1] will appear in 4.10, but [2] will appear latter than 4.10.So this > > > patch needs to go in after [1] & [2] will be merged in 4.11. > > > > So what should I do? Merge the driver for 4.11 and wait with this patch > > until [2] is merged in 4.11? Does that sound reasonable? > > > > Regards, > > > > Hans > > What do you think about this? You merge the driver first and I send this > patch again after [1] & [2] is merged. BTW, to prevent merging conflict, the dtsi should be merged by mediatek SoC maintainer, Matthias.I think we can only take care on the driver part at this moment.