linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, toshi.kani@hpe.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/11] libnvdimm, pfn, dax: stop padding pmem namespaces to section alignment
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2016 18:41:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <148125131293.13512.9530254789736709434.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <148125125407.13512.1253904589564772668.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

Now that the mm core supports section-unaligned hotplug of ZONE_DEVICE
memory, we no longer need to add padding at pfn/dax device creation
time. The kernel will still honor padding established by older kernels.

Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c |   42 +++++++-----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
index cea8350fbc7e..ead3c3186d09 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/pfn_devs.c
@@ -538,7 +538,7 @@ static struct vmem_altmap *__nvdimm_setup_pfn(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn,
 		nd_pfn->npfns = le64_to_cpu(pfn_sb->npfns);
 		altmap = NULL;
 	} else if (nd_pfn->mode == PFN_MODE_PMEM) {
-		nd_pfn->npfns = (resource_size(res) - offset) / PAGE_SIZE;
+		nd_pfn->npfns = PHYS_PFN((resource_size(res) - offset));
 		if (le64_to_cpu(nd_pfn->pfn_sb->npfns) > nd_pfn->npfns)
 			dev_info(&nd_pfn->dev,
 					"number of pfns truncated from %lld to %ld\n",
@@ -557,7 +557,6 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
 {
 	u32 dax_label_reserve = is_nd_dax(&nd_pfn->dev) ? SZ_128K : 0;
 	struct nd_namespace_common *ndns = nd_pfn->ndns;
-	u32 start_pad = 0, end_trunc = 0;
 	resource_size_t start, size;
 	struct nd_namespace_io *nsio;
 	struct nd_region *nd_region;
@@ -590,42 +589,16 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
 		return -ENXIO;
 	}
 
-	memset(pfn_sb, 0, sizeof(*pfn_sb));
-
-	/*
-	 * Check if pmem collides with 'System RAM' when section aligned and
-	 * trim it accordingly
-	 */
-	nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
-	start = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(nsio->res.start);
-	size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
-	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
-				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED) {
-		start = nsio->res.start;
-		start_pad = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start) - start;
-	}
-
-	start = nsio->res.start;
-	size = PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_UP(start + size) - start;
-	if (region_intersects(start, size, IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM,
-				IORES_DESC_NONE) == REGION_MIXED) {
-		size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
-		end_trunc = start + size - PHYS_SECTION_ALIGN_DOWN(start + size);
-	}
-
-	if (start_pad + end_trunc)
-		dev_info(&nd_pfn->dev, "%s section collision, truncate %d bytes\n",
-				dev_name(&ndns->dev), start_pad + end_trunc);
-
 	/*
 	 * Note, we use 64 here for the standard size of struct page,
 	 * debugging options may cause it to be larger in which case the
 	 * implementation will limit the pfns advertised through
 	 * ->direct_access() to those that are included in the memmap.
 	 */
-	start += start_pad;
+	nsio = to_nd_namespace_io(&ndns->dev);
+	start = nsio->res.start;
 	size = resource_size(&nsio->res);
-	npfns = (size - start_pad - end_trunc - SZ_8K) / SZ_4K;
+	npfns = PHYS_PFN(size - SZ_8K);
 	if (nd_pfn->mode == PFN_MODE_PMEM) {
 		unsigned long memmap_size;
 
@@ -642,13 +615,14 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
 	else
 		return -ENXIO;
 
-	if (offset + start_pad + end_trunc >= size) {
+	if (offset >= size) {
 		dev_err(&nd_pfn->dev, "%s unable to satisfy requested alignment\n",
 				dev_name(&ndns->dev));
 		return -ENXIO;
 	}
 
-	npfns = (size - offset - start_pad - end_trunc) / SZ_4K;
+	memset(pfn_sb, 0, sizeof(*pfn_sb));
+	npfns = PHYS_PFN(size - offset);
 	pfn_sb->mode = cpu_to_le32(nd_pfn->mode);
 	pfn_sb->dataoff = cpu_to_le64(offset);
 	pfn_sb->npfns = cpu_to_le64(npfns);
@@ -657,8 +631,6 @@ static int nd_pfn_init(struct nd_pfn *nd_pfn)
 	memcpy(pfn_sb->parent_uuid, nd_dev_to_uuid(&ndns->dev), 16);
 	pfn_sb->version_major = cpu_to_le16(1);
 	pfn_sb->version_minor = cpu_to_le16(2);
-	pfn_sb->start_pad = cpu_to_le32(start_pad);
-	pfn_sb->end_trunc = cpu_to_le32(end_trunc);
 	pfn_sb->align = cpu_to_le32(nd_pfn->align);
 	checksum = nd_sb_checksum((struct nd_gen_sb *) pfn_sb);
 	pfn_sb->checksum = cpu_to_le64(checksum);

      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-09  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-09  2:40 [PATCH v2 00/11] mm: sub-section memory hotplug support Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] mm, devm_memremap_pages: use multi-order radix for ZONE_DEVICE lookups Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] mm: introduce struct mem_section_usage to track partial population of a section Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] mm: introduce common definitions for the size and mask " Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] mm: cleanup sparse_init_one_section() return value Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:41 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] mm: track active portions of a section at boot Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:41 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] mm: fix register_new_memory() zone type detection Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:41 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] mm: convert kmalloc_section_memmap() to populate_section_memmap() Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] mm: prepare for hot-{add, remove} of sub-section ranges Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:41 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] mm: support section-unaligned ZONE_DEVICE memory ranges Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:41 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] mm: enable section-unaligned devm_memremap_pages() Dan Williams
2016-12-09  2:41 ` Dan Williams [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=148125131293.13512.9530254789736709434.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).