From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752249AbcLJFqp (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sat, 10 Dec 2016 00:46:45 -0500
Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:34546 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751359AbcLJFqn (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 10 Dec 2016 00:46:43 -0500
Message-ID: <1481348777.28041.1.camel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] livepatch: hybrid consistency model
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@canonical.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 16:46:17 +1100
In-Reply-To: <cover.1481220077.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1481220077.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.1-0ubuntu2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 12:08 -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Dusting the cobwebs off the consistency model again.  This is based on
> linux-next/master.
> 
> v1 was posted on 2015-02-09:
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1423499826.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
> 
> v2 was posted on 2016-04-28:
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1461875890.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
> 
> The biggest issue from v2 was finding a decent way to detect preemption
> and page faults on the stack of a sleeping task.  

Could you please elaborate on this? Preemption of a sleeping task and
faults as in the future (time) preemption and faults?

Balbir Singh.