From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1754573AbcLTVxl (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:53:41 -0500
Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:36321 "EHLO
        mail-pg0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752340AbcLTVxi (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:53:38 -0500
Message-ID: <1482270801.1521.25.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/blkback: use rb_entry()
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Roger Pau =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
        Geliang Tang <geliangtang@gmail.com>, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:53:21 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20161220175113.GB16671@char.us.oracle.com>
References: <ddabc96c798df194791134d8e070d728e2a7b59f.1482203698.git.geliangtang@gmail.com>
         <ce9bc88496a04e6495320b041a0de4e0155b76a9.1482205355.git.geliangtang@gmail.com>
         <20161220164703.GL10069@char.us.oracle.com>
         <20161220174406.uewt5mhniwtznran@dhcp-3-221.uk.xensource.com>
         <20161220175113.GB16671@char.us.oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2016-12-20 at 12:51 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 05:44:06PM +0000, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 11:47:03AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 10:02:19PM +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > > > To make the code clearer, use rb_entry() instead of container_of() to
> > > > deal with rbtree.
> > > 
> > > That is OK but I think 'container_of' is more clear.
> > > 
> > > Roger, thoughts?
> > 
> > I think so, container_of is a global macro that's widely used and everyone
> > knows, rb_entry OTOH it's not and it's use doesn't really simply the code at
> > all. I'm not really opposed, but it seems kind of a pointless change (not that
> > it's wrong).
> 
> <nods> I concur.
> 
> Geliang Tang,
> 
> Thank you for the patch but there is no need for it.

The same could be said of list_entry()

#define hlist_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr,type,member)

#define list_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr, type, member)

# git grep -n list_entry | wc -l
3636

rb_entry() will probably make its way everywhere.