From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751112AbcL1IhO (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 03:37:14 -0500 Received: from paleale.coelho.fi ([176.9.41.70]:32898 "EHLO farmhouse.coelho.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750969AbcL1IhL (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 03:37:11 -0500 Message-ID: <1482914225.8602.5.camel@coelho.fi> From: Luca Coelho To: Emmanuel Grumbach , Peter Xu Cc: Kalle Valo , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-wireless Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 10:37:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20161227091706.GA20895@pxdev.xzpeter.org> <871swtkvdc.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <20161228035959.GB3924@pxdev.xzpeter.org> <1482910035.8602.3.camel@coelho.fi> <20161228081039.GA3874@pxdev.xzpeter.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.2-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 91.156.4.241 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: luca@coelho.fi Subject: Re: Intel Wireless 7260 failed to work X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 02 Aug 2016 21:08:31 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on farmhouse.coelho.fi) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2016-12-28 at 10:17 +0200, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Peter Xu wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:27:15AM +0200, Luca Coelho wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > Is this a known issue? Please let me know if anyone wants more info or > > > > > > logs, since this error triggers easily (everytime I boot). > > > > > > > > > > The error message isn't really telling much to the user (hint hint) but > > > > > I suspect this is by design: > > > > > > > > > > "iwlwifi: remove support for fw older than -17 and -22 > > > > > > Right, we only maintain support for a certain number of firmware > > > versions. The FW APIs change with time and we don't want to keep all > > > legacy code supporting old firmwares in the driver forever. > > > > > > I agree that "no suitable firmware found!" is a bit scarce. I'll see > > > if we can improve that with something: "no suitable firmware found! You > > > need iwlwifi-7260-17.ucode ()". > > > > That'll be great if we can have this info in the log. Maybe no need > > for a full URL, the firmware name would suffice at least for me. > > In this case, I think we should also print the range that is supported > when we fail to find any suitable firmware. Sure, I'll do that. I just wanted to keep it simple in this thread. ;) -- Luca.