linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lilja.magnus@gmail.com,
	festevam@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 1/2] arm: Cleanup sanity_check_meminfo
Date: Thu,  5 Jan 2017 15:01:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1483657274-11346-2-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1483657274-11346-1-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com>


The logic for sanity_check_meminfo has become difficult to
follow. Clean up the code so it's more obvious what the code
is actually trying to do. Additionally, meminfo is now removed
so rename the function to better describe it's purpose.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
---
v2: Fixed code so b9a019899f61 ("ARM: 8590/1: sanity_check_meminfo():
avoid overflow on vmalloc_limit") should stay fixed. The casting and assignment
still seem ugly. Also corrected the size for memblock_remove with
!CONFIG_HIGHMEM (found by inspection, memblock was handling it properly).
---
 arch/arm/kernel/setup.c |  4 +--
 arch/arm/mm/mmu.c       | 65 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
 arch/arm/mm/nommu.c     |  8 +++---
 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
index 34e3f3c..8a8051c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ __setup("fpe=", fpe_setup);
 extern void init_default_cache_policy(unsigned long);
 extern void paging_init(const struct machine_desc *desc);
 extern void early_paging_init(const struct machine_desc *);
-extern void sanity_check_meminfo(void);
+extern void adjust_lowmem_bounds(void);
 extern enum reboot_mode reboot_mode;
 extern void setup_dma_zone(const struct machine_desc *desc);
 
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	setup_dma_zone(mdesc);
 	xen_early_init();
 	efi_init();
-	sanity_check_meminfo();
+	adjust_lowmem_bounds();
 	arm_memblock_init(mdesc);
 
 	early_ioremap_reset();
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 4001dd1..ce5123b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -1152,13 +1152,11 @@ early_param("vmalloc", early_vmalloc);
 
 phys_addr_t arm_lowmem_limit __initdata = 0;
 
-void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
+void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
 {
 	phys_addr_t memblock_limit = 0;
-	int highmem = 0;
 	u64 vmalloc_limit;
 	struct memblock_region *reg;
-	bool should_use_highmem = false;
 
 	/*
 	 * Let's use our own (unoptimized) equivalent of __pa() that is
@@ -1172,43 +1170,19 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
 	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
 		phys_addr_t block_start = reg->base;
 		phys_addr_t block_end = reg->base + reg->size;
-		phys_addr_t size_limit = reg->size;
 
-		if (reg->base >= vmalloc_limit)
-			highmem = 1;
-		else
-			size_limit = vmalloc_limit - reg->base;
 
-
-		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || cache_is_vipt_aliasing()) {
-
-			if (highmem) {
-				pr_notice("Ignoring RAM at %pa-%pa (!CONFIG_HIGHMEM)\n",
-					  &block_start, &block_end);
-				memblock_remove(reg->base, reg->size);
-				should_use_highmem = true;
-				continue;
-			}
-
-			if (reg->size > size_limit) {
-				phys_addr_t overlap_size = reg->size - size_limit;
-
-				pr_notice("Truncating RAM at %pa-%pa",
-					  &block_start, &block_end);
-				block_end = vmalloc_limit;
-				pr_cont(" to -%pa", &block_end);
-				memblock_remove(vmalloc_limit, overlap_size);
-				should_use_highmem = true;
-			}
-		}
-
-		if (!highmem) {
-			if (block_end > arm_lowmem_limit) {
-				if (reg->size > size_limit)
-					arm_lowmem_limit = vmalloc_limit;
-				else
-					arm_lowmem_limit = block_end;
-			}
+		if (reg->base < vmalloc_limit) {
+			if (block_end > arm_lowmem_limit)
+				/*
+				 * Compare as u64 to ensure vmalloc_limit does
+				 * not get truncated. block_end should always
+				 * fit in phys_addr_t so there should be no
+				 * issue with assignment.
+				 */
+				arm_lowmem_limit = min_t(u64,
+							 vmalloc_limit,
+							 block_end);
 
 			/*
 			 * Find the first non-pmd-aligned page, and point
@@ -1233,9 +1207,6 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (should_use_highmem)
-		pr_notice("Consider using a HIGHMEM enabled kernel.\n");
-
 	high_memory = __va(arm_lowmem_limit - 1) + 1;
 
 	/*
@@ -1248,6 +1219,18 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
 	if (!memblock_limit)
 		memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
 
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HIGHMEM) || cache_is_vipt_aliasing()) {
+		if (memblock_end_of_DRAM() > arm_lowmem_limit) {
+			phys_addr_t end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
+
+			pr_notice("Ignoring RAM at %pa-%pa\n",
+				  &memblock_limit, &end);
+			pr_notice("Consider using a HIGHMEM enabled kernel.\n");
+
+			memblock_remove(memblock_limit, end - memblock_limit);
+		}
+	}
+
 	memblock_set_current_limit(memblock_limit);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c b/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c
index 2740967..13a25d6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/nommu.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static unsigned long irbar_read(void)
 }
 
 /* MPU initialisation functions */
-void __init sanity_check_meminfo_mpu(void)
+void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds_mpu(void)
 {
 	phys_addr_t phys_offset = PHYS_OFFSET;
 	phys_addr_t aligned_region_size, specified_mem_size, rounded_mem_size;
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void __init mpu_setup(void)
 	}
 }
 #else
-static void sanity_check_meminfo_mpu(void) {}
+static void adjust_lowmem_bounds_mpu(void) {}
 static void __init mpu_setup(void) {}
 #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_MPU */
 
@@ -295,10 +295,10 @@ void __init arm_mm_memblock_reserve(void)
 #endif
 }
 
-void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
+void __init adjust_lowmem_bounds(void)
 {
 	phys_addr_t end;
-	sanity_check_meminfo_mpu();
+	adjust_lowmem_bounds_mpu();
 	end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
 	high_memory = __va(end - 1) + 1;
 	memblock_set_current_limit(end);
-- 
2.7.4

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-05 23:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-05 23:01 [PATCHv2 0/2] Memblock cleanup plus memory removal fix Laura Abbott
2017-01-05 23:01 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2017-01-06  4:17   ` [PATCHv2 1/2] arm: Cleanup sanity_check_meminfo Nicolas Pitre
2017-01-10  1:07     ` Laura Abbott
2017-01-05 23:01 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] arm: Adjust memory boundaries after reservations Laura Abbott
2017-01-06  0:41   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-06  9:46 ` [PATCHv2 0/2] Memblock cleanup plus memory removal fix Magnus Lilja

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1483657274-11346-2-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com \
    --to=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=lauraa@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=lilja.magnus@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).