From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030292AbdAKPXD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:23:03 -0500 Received: from smtp2.provo.novell.com ([137.65.250.81]:50666 "EHLO smtp2.provo.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750777AbdAKPWx (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:22:53 -0500 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org Cc: oleg@redhat.com, dave@stgolabs.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: [PATCH 2/2] locking/percpu-rwsem: Replace waitqueue with rcuwait Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 07:22:26 -0800 Message-Id: <1484148146-14210-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.6.6 In-Reply-To: <1484148146-14210-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> References: <1484148146-14210-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The use of any kind of wait queue is an overkill for pcpu-rwsems. While one option would be to use the less heavy simple (swait) flavor, this is still too much for what pcpu-rwsems needs. For one, we do not care about any sort of queuing in that the only (rare) time writers (and readers, for that matter) are queued is when trying to acquire the regular contended rw_sem. There cannot be any further queuing as writers are serialized by the rw_sem in the first place. Given that percpu_down_write() must not be called after exit_notify(), we can replace the bulky waitqueue with rcuwait such that a writer can wait for its turn to take the lock. As such, we can avoid the queue handling and locking overhead. Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso --- include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h | 8 ++++---- kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c | 7 +++---- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h index 5b2e6159b744..93664f022ecf 100644 --- a/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h +++ b/include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h @@ -4,15 +4,15 @@ #include #include #include -#include +#include #include #include struct percpu_rw_semaphore { struct rcu_sync rss; unsigned int __percpu *read_count; - struct rw_semaphore rw_sem; - wait_queue_head_t writer; + struct rw_semaphore rw_sem; /* slowpath */ + struct rcuwait writer; /* blocked writer */ int readers_block; }; @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static struct percpu_rw_semaphore name = { \ .rss = __RCU_SYNC_INITIALIZER(name.rss, RCU_SCHED_SYNC), \ .read_count = &__percpu_rwsem_rc_##name, \ .rw_sem = __RWSEM_INITIALIZER(name.rw_sem), \ - .writer = __WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_INITIALIZER(name.writer), \ + .writer = __RCUWAIT_INITIALIZER(name.writer), \ } extern int __percpu_down_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *, int); diff --git a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c index ce182599cf2e..883cf1b92d90 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c +++ b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ #include #include #include -#include #include #include #include @@ -18,7 +17,7 @@ int __percpu_init_rwsem(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, /* ->rw_sem represents the whole percpu_rw_semaphore for lockdep */ rcu_sync_init(&sem->rss, RCU_SCHED_SYNC); __init_rwsem(&sem->rw_sem, name, rwsem_key); - init_waitqueue_head(&sem->writer); + rcuwait_init(&sem->writer); sem->readers_block = 0; return 0; } @@ -103,7 +102,7 @@ void __percpu_up_read(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) __this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count); /* Prod writer to recheck readers_active */ - wake_up(&sem->writer); + rcuwait_wake_up(&sem->writer); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_up_read); @@ -160,7 +159,7 @@ void percpu_down_write(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem) */ /* Wait for all now active readers to complete. */ - wait_event(sem->writer, readers_active_check(sem)); + rcuwait_wait_event(&sem->writer, readers_active_check(sem)); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_down_write); -- 2.6.6