From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932865AbdC2NOj (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:14:39 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59538 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932111AbdC2NOh (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:14:37 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 67785C03BD7C Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=riel@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 67785C03BD7C Message-ID: <1490793272.28917.5.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [BUG nohz]: wrong user and system time accounting From: Rik van Riel To: Frederic Weisbecker , Luiz Capitulino Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 09:14:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170329130447.GB8306@lerouge> References: <20170323165512.60945ac6@redhat.com> <20170329130447.GB8306@lerouge> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.31]); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:14:36 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2017-03-29 at 15:04 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:55:12PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > > > When there are two or more tasks executing in user-space and > > taking 100% of a nohz_full CPU, top reports 70% system time > > and 30% user time utilization. Sometimes I'm even able to get > > 100% system time and 0% user time. > > > > This was reproduced with latest Linus tree (093b995), but I > > don't believe it's a regression (at least not a recent one) > > as I can reproduce it with older kernels. Also, I have > > CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING=y and haven't tried to reproduce > > without it yet. > > > > Below you'll find the steps to reproduce and some initial > > analysis. > > > > Steps to reproduce > > ------------------ > > > > 1. Set up a CPU for nohz_full with isolcpus= nohz_full= > > > > 2. Pin two tasks that hog the CPU 100% of the time to that CPU > > I failed to reproduce with your config. I'm still getting 99% > userspace > cputime. So I'm wondering if the hogging style plays a role. > > I run pure user loops: > >     int main(int argc, char **argv) >     { >         for (;;); >         return 0 >     } > > Does your user program perform syscalls or IOs of some sort? Luiz's program makes a syscall every millisecond, if started with the arguments he gave as his reproducer.