linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@163.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, subashab@codeaurora.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] sysctl: don't print negative flag for proc_douintvec
Date: Fri,  7 Apr 2017 23:51:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1491580267-36340-3-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491580267-36340-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com>

From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>

I saw some very confusing sysctl output on my system:
  # cat /proc/sys/net/core/xfrm_aevent_rseqth
  -2
  # cat /proc/sys/net/core/xfrm_aevent_etime
  -10
  cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat
  -4294967295

Because we forget to set the *negp flag in proc_douintvec, so it will
become a garbage value.

Since the value related to proc_douintvec is always an unsigned integer,
so we can set *negp to false explictily to fix this issue.

Fixes: e7d316a02f68 ("sysctl: handle error writing UINT_MAX to u32 fields")
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/sysctl.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index acf0a5a..8cca4c7 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -2136,6 +2136,7 @@ static int do_proc_douintvec_conv(bool *negp, unsigned long *lvalp,
 		*valp = *lvalp;
 	} else {
 		unsigned int val = *valp;
+		*negp = false;
 		*lvalp = (unsigned long)val;
 	}
 	return 0;
-- 
2.5.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-07 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-07 15:51 [PATCH 0/3] sysctl: fix some bugs related to proc_douintvec Liping Zhang
2017-04-07 15:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] sysctl: add sanity check for proc_douintvec Liping Zhang
2017-04-07 15:51 ` Liping Zhang [this message]
2017-04-07 15:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] sysctl: report EINVAL if value is larger than UINT_MAX " Liping Zhang
2017-04-07 16:49   ` Linus Torvalds
2017-04-07 21:01     ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-04-08 17:21       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1491580267-36340-3-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com \
    --to=zlpnobody@163.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zlpnobody@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).